Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28434745›Full record

ArticleJournal of dairy science2017

Hot topic: 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals the microbiome of the virgin and pregnant bovine uterus.

S G Moore, A C Ericsson, S E Poock, P Melendez, M C Lucy

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dairy science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
15.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Characterization of biofilm and exopolysaccharide production in Bacillus strains isolated from the bovine uterus.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. No Genomic Signatures Were Found inVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reproductive Tract Microbiota of Mares.Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

S G MooreDivision of Animal Sciences.
A C EricssonDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; University of Missouri Metagenomics Center, University of Missouri, Columbia 65201.
S E PoockCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.
P MelendezCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211.
M C LucyDivision of Animal Sciences. Electronic address: lucym@missouri.edu.
Missouri College · USAnimal Welfare Institute · USInstitute of Animal Sciences · CNUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Impact of gut microbiota and segmented filamentous bacteria on colitis-associated colorectal cancerK01OD019924 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ERICSSON, AARON · 2016 to 2020
$573k
NIH HHS K01 OD019924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that the uterus of virgin heifers and pregnant cows possessed a resident microbiome by 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the virgin and pregnant bovine uterus. The endometrium of 10 virgin heifers in estrus and the amniotic fluid, placentome, intercotyledonary placenta, cervical lumen, and external cervix surface (control) of 5 pregnant cows were sampled using aseptic techniques. The DNA was extracted, the V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified, and amplicons were sequenced using Illumina MiSeq technology (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA). Operational taxonomic units (OTU) were generated from the sequences using Qiime v1.8 software, and taxonomy was assigned using the Greengenes database. The effect of tissue on the microbial composition within the pregnant uterus was tested using univariate (mixed model) and multivariate (permutational multivariate ANOVA) procedures. Amplicons of 16S rRNA gene were generated in all samples, supporting the contention that the uterus of virgin heifers and pregnant cows contained a microbiome. On average, 53, 199, 380, 382, 525, and 13,589 reads annotated as 16, 35, 43, 63, 48, and 176 OTU in the placentome, virgin endometrium, amniotic fluid, cervical lumen, intercotyledonary placenta, and external surface of the cervix, respectively, were generated. The 3 most abundant phyla in the uterus of the virgin heifers and pregnant cows were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria, and they accounted for approximately 40, 35, and 10% of the sequences, respectively. Phyla abundance was similar between the tissues of the pregnant uterus. Principal component analysis, one-way PERMANOVA analysis of the Bray-Curtis similarity index, and mixed model analysis of the Shannon diversity index and Chao1 index demonstrated that the microbiome of the control tissue (external surface of the cervix) was significantly different from that of the amniotic fluid, intercotyledonary placenta, and placentome tissues. Interestingly, many bacterial species associated with postpartum uterine disease (i.e., Trueperella spp., Acinetobacter spp., Fusobacteria spp., Proteus spp., Prevotella spp., and Peptostreptococcus spp.) were also present in the uterus of virgin heifers and of pregnant cows. The presence of 16S rRNA gene sequence reads in the samples from the current study suggests that the uterine microbiome is established by the time a female reaches reproductive maturity, and that pregnancies are established and maintained in the presence of a uterine microbiome.

Indexed as

Amniotic FluidAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBacillotaBacteroidetesCattleCervix UteriFemaleMicrobiotaPlacentaPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrincipal Component AnalysisProteobacteriaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16Smicrobiomepregnancyuterine healthuterus

Identifiers

PMID28434745
PMCPMC6344888
OpenAlexW2606864423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.