Trial reportLancet (London, England)2017
Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 17 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2,576 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1/2, Dose-escalation, Open-label, Non-comparative Study of Nivolumab or Nivolumab in Combination With Ipilimumab in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subjects With or Without Chronic Viral Hepatitis; and a Randomized, Open-label Study of Nivolumab vs Sorafenib in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Subjects Who Are Naive to Systemic Therapy
A Multicenter, Open-label, Single-arm Study of the Safety and Antitumoral Efficacy of Nivolumab After SIRT Using SIR-Spheres for the Treatment of Patients With HepatoCellular Carcinoma That Are Candidates for Locoregional Therapies
Immunotherapy by Nivolumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With Advanced HCC Treated by Electroporation in Curative Intent: French Multicenter Phase 2 Therapeutic Trial.
A Phase I Clinical Study for Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Repeated Doses, Dose Escalation of GR1405 Injection in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor or Lymphoma
Lenvatinib Combined Pembrolizumab as a Second-line Treatment in Advanced Hepatobiliary Tumors: a Single-center, Single-arm, Non-randomized Clinical Study
a Single-arm Study of Combined Therapy Using Oxaliplatin and Gemcitabine Chemotherapy, Lenvatinib and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Antibody (JS001) for Patients With Advanced and Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Axitinib Plus Toripalimab as Second-line Treatment in Hepatobiliary Malignant Tumors: a Single-arm, Non-randomized, Single-center Phase II Trial
An Exploratory Study of Sorafenib Plus Toripalimab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus
Combining Radiation Therapy With Anti-PD-1 for Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (RT+PD-1-HCC)
Phase II Study of Regorafenib-nivolumab Combination Therapy for Chemotherapy-naïve Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
A Randomized, Open, Two-cohort Phase 2 Study of Toripalimab(PD1) Combined With Lenvatnib, or Gemox Chemotherapy Combined With Lenvatinib as First-line Therapy in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Organ-specific Responses to Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Phase II Trial of Regorafenib in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Progression on First Line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab (REGONEXT Trial)
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Combine With Lenvatinib and PD-1 Inhibitors for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis.
A Prospective Cohort Study of Single Agent Memantine in Patients With Child-Pugh Score ≥ B7 Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Setting in Patients With HCC Treated by by Percutaneous Ablation Procedure in Curative Intent: French Multicenter Phase 2 Therapeutic
Plasma Biomarker in Predicting Response and Toxicity in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated With Checkpoint Inhibitors With or Without Sterotatic Body Radiotherapy
Who cites it
2,576 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Response Rate Correlates with the Conversion Rate in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Systemic or Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review.Digestive surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Current progress and emerging trends of car-based immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a data-driven atlas from multidatabase integration.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Integrated single-cell multi-omics characterization reveals lipid-associated macrophage-mediated immunosuppression in neoadjuvant immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Clinical Trial: Early Nivolumab Addition to Regorafenib in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Second-Line (The GOING Trial).Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Trial
- T-Cell Receptor and Immune Gene Expression Pharmacodynamics for Durvalumab Alone and with Tremelimumab or Bevacizumab in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Meox1 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression potentially via regulation of cell cycle and p21 expression.Cell adhesion & migration · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy for virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress and future directions.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Patient characteristics to guide personalized treatment decisions and prognostication in hepatocellular carcinoma.Hepatic oncology · 2026Review
- Systemic treatment paradigms for unresectable and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- A Computed Tomography Radiomics Approach for Assessing the T Cell-Inflamed Gene Expression Profile in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Its Association With Immunotherapy Response.Health care science · 2026Article
- Combining antiviral therapy with cancer treatment in HBV-associated HCC: A translational approach.Virus research · 2026Review
- Neoantigen cancer vaccines for gastrointestinal tumors: opportunities and challenges.MedScience · 2026Review
- Synthetic long peptide and DNA personalized cancer vaccines induce robust neoantigen-specific T cell responses in pancreatic cancer.Science advances · 2026Article
- Rechallenge with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Liver cancer · 2026Review
- A multicenter pilot study of nivolumab with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver-limited hepatocellular carcinoma.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- NRF2-mediated immune evasion and ferroptosis resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitor response.Journal of liver cancer · 2026Article
- Natural killer cells against viral infection: from basic biology to immunotherapy.Precision clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hepatic and Pancreatobiliary Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hepatitis B Virus-Positive Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Article
2,516 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, sorafenib is the only approved drug worldwide, and outcomes remain poor. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of nivolumab, a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitor, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with or without chronic viral hepatitis.
methodsWe did a phase 1/2, open-label, non-comparative, dose escalation and expansion trial (CheckMate 040) of nivolumab in adults (≥18 years) with histologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with or without hepatitis C or B (HCV or HBV) infection. Previous sorafenib treatment was allowed. A dose-escalation phase was conducted at seven hospitals or academic centres in four countries or territories (USA, Spain, Hong Kong, and Singapore) and a dose-expansion phase was conducted at an additional 39 sites in 11 countries (Canada, UK, Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan). At screening, eligible patients had Child-Pugh scores of 7 or less (Child-Pugh A or B7) for the dose-escalation phase and 6 or less (Child-Pugh A) for the dose-expansion phase, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or less. Patients with HBV infection had to be receiving effective antiviral therapy (viral load <100 IU/mL); antiviral therapy was not required for patients with HCV infection. We excluded patients previously treated with an agent targeting T-cell costimulation or checkpoint pathways. Patients received intravenous nivolumab 0·1-10 mg/kg every 2 weeks in the dose-escalation phase (3+3 design). Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was given every 2 weeks in the dose-expansion phase to patients in four cohorts: sorafenib untreated or intolerant without viral hepatitis, sorafenib progressor without viral hepatitis, HCV infected, and HBV infected. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability for the escalation phase and objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1) for the expansion phase. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01658878.
findingsBetween Nov 26, 2012, and Aug 8, 2016, 262 eligible patients were treated (48 patients in the dose-escalation phase and 214 in the dose-expansion phase). 202 (77%) of 262 patients have completed treatment and follow-up is ongoing. During dose escalation, nivolumab showed a manageable safety profile, including acceptable tolerability. In this phase, 46 (96%) of 48 patients discontinued treatment, 42 (88%) due to disease progression. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events did not seem to be associated with dose and no maximum tolerated dose was reached. 12 (25%) of 48 patients had grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events. Three (6%) patients had treatment-related serious adverse events (pemphigoid, adrenal insufficiency, liver disorder). 30 (63%) of 48 patients in the dose-escalation phase died (not determined to be related to nivolumab therapy). Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was chosen for dose expansion. The objective response rate was 20% (95% CI 15-26) in patients treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg in the dose-expansion phase and 15% (95% CI 6-28) in the dose-escalation phase.
interpretationNivolumab had a manageable safety profile and no new signals were observed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Durable objective responses show the potential of nivolumab for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
fundingBristol-Myers Squibb.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.