Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28434635›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric urology2017

Readmissions, unplanned emergency room visits, and surgical retreatment rates after anti-reflux procedures.

Hsin-Hsiao S Wang, Rohit Tejwani, Steven Wolf, John S Wiener, Jonathan C Routh

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hsin-Hsiao S WangDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: scottwang3@gmail.com.
Rohit TejwaniDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Steven WolfDepartment of Statistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
John S WienerDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jonathan C RouthDivision of Urologic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Comparative Effectiveness of Vesicoureteral Reflux Treatments in ChildrenK08DK100534 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROUTH, JONATHAN C · 2014 to 2018
$671k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK100534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/

backgroundThe choice between endoscopic injection (EI) and ureteroneocystotomy (UNC) for surgical correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is controversial.

objectiveTo compare postoperative outcomes of EI vs UNC. STUDY

designThis study reviewed linked inpatient (SID), ambulatory surgery (SASD), and emergency department (SEDD) data from five states in the United States (2007-10) to identify pediatric patients with primary VUR undergoing EI or UNC as an initial surgical intervention. Unplanned readmissions, additional procedures, and emergency room (ER) visits were extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression using generalized estimating equation (GEE) to adjust for hospital-level clustering.

resultsThe study identified 2556 UNC and 1997 EI procedures. Compared with patients undergoing EI, those who underwent UNC were more likely to be younger (4.6 vs 6.0 years, P < 0.001), male (30 vs 20%, P < 0.001), and publicly insured (34 vs 29%, P < 0.001). As shown in Summary Figure, compared with EI, UNC patients had lower rates of additional anti-reflux procedures within 12 months (25 (1.0) vs 121 (6.1%), P < 0.001), but a higher rate of 30-day and 90-day readmissions and ER visits. On multivariate analysis, patients treated by UNC remained at higher odds of being readmitted (OR = 4.45; 2.69 in 30 days; 90 days, P < 0.001) and to have postoperative ER visits (OR = 3.33; 2.26 in 30 days; 90 days, P < 0.001); however, EI had significantly higher odds of repeat anti-reflux procedures in the subsequent year (OR = 7.12, P < 0.001). DISCUSSIONS: Endoscopic injection constituted nearly half of initial anti-reflux procedures in children. However, patients treated with UNC had significantly lower odds of requiring re-treatment in the first year relative to those treated with EI. By contrast, patients treated with UNC had more than twice the odds of being readmitted or visiting an ER postoperatively. Although the available data were amongst the largest and most well validated, the major limitation was the retrospective nature of the administrative database. The practice setting may not be generalizable to states not included in the analysis.

conclusionsPostoperative readmissions and ER visits were uncommon after any surgical intervention for VUR, but were more common among children undergoing UNC. The EI patients had a more than seven-fold increased risk of surgical re-treatment within 1 year.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesCystostomyDatabases, FactualEmergency Service, HospitalEndoscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansInjections, IntralesionalMultivariate AnalysisPatient ReadmissionReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentComplicationSurgeryUrologyVesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID28434635
PMCPMC5632086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.