Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28434393›Full record

ArticleJournal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE2017

Barriers and Strategies Related to Qualitative Research on Genetic Ancestry Testing in Indigenous Communities.

Jessica W Blanchard, Gloria Tallbull, Chantelle Wolpert, Jill Powell, Morris W Foster, Charmaine Royal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Adapting a conceptual framework to engage diverse stakeholders in genomic/precision medicine research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.Journal of community genetics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica W Blanchard1 University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Gloria Tallbull1 University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Chantelle Wolpert2 Emory & Henry College, Marion, VA, USA.
Jill Powell3 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Morris W Foster4 Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
Charmaine Royal3 Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Public Perspectives and Experience Regarding Genetic Ancestry TestingR01HG006295 · NHGRI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ROYAL, CHARMAINE DAWN MARIE · 2012 to 2015
$1.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG006295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting genetics-related research with populations that have historically experienced considerable harm and little benefit from genetics research poses unique challenges for understanding community-based perceptions of new genetic technologies. This article identifies challenges and strategies for collecting qualitative data on the perceptions of direct-to-consumer (DTC) Genetic Ancestry tests (GAT) among diverse Indigenous communities. Based on a 3-year project related to perceptions, attitudes, and values associated with genetic ancestry testing among diverse Indigenous communities in Oklahoma, the engagement process revealed specific opportunities to improve the process of qualitative data collection related to GAT, and more broadly, to conduct genetics-related research with Indigenous communities in culturally and methodologically appropriate ways. Priority areas include issues related to participant recruitment and tribal advisory boards, challenges of self-identification as a recruitment mechanism, and the necessity of including Indigenous researchers in all aspects of the research process.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCultural CompetencyGenetic ResearchGenetic TestingIndians, North AmericanResidence CharacteristicsAdvisory CommitteesCultureFemaleHumansMaleOklahomaQualitative ResearchResearch PersonnelSocial Valuesancestrybioethicscommunity-basedDNAethnographic methodsgenetic researchIndigenous/aboriginal/native populationsqualitative methodsresearch ethicstribal

Identifiers

PMID28434393
PMCPMC5481484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.