Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28434211›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol review2018

Health conditions and motivations for marijuana use among young adult medical marijuana patients and non-patient marijuana users.

Stephen E Lankenau, Janna Ataiants, Salini Mohanty, Sheree Schrager, Ellen Iverson, Carolyn F Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Latent transition analysis of time-varying cannabis use motives to inform adaptive interventions.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen E LankenauDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Janna AtaiantsDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Salini MohantyDepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Sheree SchragerChildren's Hospital Los Angeles, Division of Hospital Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Ellen IversonDepartment of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Carolyn F WongDepartment of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles · USDrexel University · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL SCI TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007233 · NIDA · PUBLIC HEALTH SOLUTIONS · PI GOLDSAMT, LLOYD A · 1985 to 2023
$20.2M
Medical Marijuana, Emerging Adults & Community: Connecting Health and PolicyR01DA034067 · NIDA · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI Stephen E Lankenau, Carolyn Fong Nap Wong · 2013 to 2026
$9.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034067NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile marijuana has been legal for medical purposes in California since 1996, little is known about the health histories of young adult medical marijuana patients who are a significant proportion of medical marijuana patients. We examined whether young adult medical marijuana patients reported health conditions and motivations for use that were consistent with medical use of marijuana in California.

methodsYoung adults (N = 366) aged 18 to 26 years were sampled in Los Angeles in 2014-2015 and segmented into medical marijuana 'patients' (n = 210), marijuana users with a current recommendation, and non-patient users or 'non-patients' (n = 156), marijuana users who never had a medical marijuana recommendation. Differences between patients and non-patients regarding self-reported health histories and past/current motivations for marijuana use were expressed as unadjusted risk ratios.

resultsCompared with non-patients, patients were significantly more likely to report a range of lifetime health problems, such as psychological, physical pain and gastrointestinal. In the past 90 days, patients were significantly more likely to report motivations for marijuana use than non-patients concerning sleep, anxiety, physical pain and focusing. Psychological and pain problems were the most common health conditions reported to receive a medical marijuana recommendation. Patients were significantly less likely than non-patients to report any privacy concerns about obtaining a medical marijuana recommendation.

conclusionsPatients were significantly more likely to report a range of health conditions and motivations associated with medical use than non-patients. A great majority of patients reported obtaining a medical marijuana recommendation for health problems in accordance with the California law. [Lankenau SE, Ataiants J,Mohanty S, Schrager S, Iverson E, Wong CF.Health conditions and motivations for marijuana use among young adultmedical marijuana patients and non-patient marijuana users. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;00:000-000].

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultAnxietyFemaleHumansLos AngelesMaleMarijuana SmokingMedical MarijuanaPain ManagementSelf ReportYoung AdultMedical Marijuanamedical marijuanaphysical healthpsychological healthyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28434211
PMCPMC5732072
OpenAlexW2607158835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.