Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28434119›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2017

Cost analysis for the implementation of a medication review with follow-up service in Spain.

Aranzazu Noain, Victoria Garcia-Cardenas, Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia, Amaia Malet-Larrea, Fernando Martinez-Martinez, Daniel Sabater-Hernandez, Shalom I Benrimoj

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348538 (Feasibility Study of the Medication Review With Follow up Service for Patients With Polypharmacy in Swiss Community Pharmacies), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348538 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study of the Medication Review With Follow up Service for Patients With Polypharmacy in Swiss Community Pharmacies

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, SwitzerlandRan2023 to 2024Enrolled162ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsMedication review with follow up or MaJ? for the acronym in french
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cost analysis and cost-benefit analysis of a medication review with follow-up service in aged polypharmacy patients.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aranzazu NoainPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n., 18071, Granada, Spain.
Victoria Garcia-CardenasGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway New South Wales 2007, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, Australia. victoria.garciacardenas@uts.edu.au.
Miguel Angel GastelurrutiaPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n., 18071, Granada, Spain.
Amaia Malet-LarreaPharmaceutical Technology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country, 01006, Vitoria, Spain.
Fernando Martinez-MartinezPharmaceutical Care Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n., 18071, Granada, Spain.
Daniel Sabater-HernandezGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway New South Wales 2007, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, Australia.
Shalom I BenrimojGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway New South Wales 2007, P.O. Box 123, Sydney, Australia.
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medication review with follow-up (MRF) is a professional pharmacy service proven to be cost-effective. Its broader implementation is limited, mainly due to the lack of evidence-based implementation programs that include economic and financial analysis. Objective To analyse the costs and estimate the price of providing and implementing MRF. Setting Community pharmacy in Spain. Method Elderly patients using poly-pharmacy received a community pharmacist-led MRF for 6 months. The cost analysis was based on the time-driven activity based costing model and included the provider costs, initial investment costs and maintenance expenses. The service price was estimated using the labour costs, costs associated with service provision, potential number of patients receiving the service and mark-up. Main outcome measures Costs and potential price of MRF. Results A mean time of 404.4 (SD 232.2) was spent on service provision and was extrapolated to annual costs. Service provider cost per patient ranged from €196 (SD 90.5) to €310 (SD 164.4). The mean initial investment per pharmacy was €4594 and the mean annual maintenance costs €3,068. Largest items contributing to cost were initial staff training, continuing education and renting of the patient counselling area. The potential service price ranged from €237 to €628 per patient a year. Conclusion Time spent by the service provider accounted for 75-95% of the final cost, followed by initial investment costs and maintenance costs. Remuneration for professional pharmacy services provision must cover service costs and appropriate profit, allowing for their long-term sustainability.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Pharmacy ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug Utilization ReviewFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePharmacistsSpainCommunity pharmacyCost analysisImplementationMedication reviewProfessional pharmacy servicesSpainSustainability

Identifiers

PMID28434119
OpenAlexW2607381380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.