SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017
A systematic review of psychosocial interventions for colorectal cancer patients.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Anxiety and Depression after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.Alpha psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of Psycho-education Interventions on Colorectal Cancer Patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Impact of non-pharmacological interventions on quality of life, anxiety, and depression scores in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2018Pooled it
- Effects of Cognitive Training and Social Support on Cancer-Related Fatigue and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Integrative cancer therapiesPooled it
- Resiliency among older adults receiving lung cancer treatment (ROAR-LCT): A novel supportive care intervention for older adults with advanced lung cancer.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2024Trial
- Preventing adverse events of chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer by educating patients about the nocebo effect: a randomized-controlled trial.BMC cancer · 2022Trial
- A Theory-Based, Multidisciplinary Approach to Cocreate a Patient-Centric Digital Solution to Enhance Perioperative Health Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Development and Evaluation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Trial
- Post-Treatment Nutrition and Rehabilitation Support Is Associated with Reduced Psychological Distress After Early-Stage Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of Online Oncology Yoga and Mindfulness-Based Meditation on Fatigue, Sleep, and Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study.Florence Nightingale journal of nursing · 2026Article
- The quality of life of colorectal cancer patients attending the cancer center in addis Ababa, Ethiopia.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Impact of Rehabilitation Intervention for Cancer Patients with Spinal Bone Metastasis: Psychosocial and Clinical Outcomes.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions in patients with colorectal cancer: an overview of systematic reviews.Journal of rehabilitation medicine · 2025Review
- Guideline for the assessment and management of gastrointestinal symptoms following colorectal surgery-A UEG/ESCP/EAES/ESPCG/ESPEN/ESNM/ESSO collaboration. Part I-Sequelae to oncological diseases.United European gastroenterology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Willingness toward psychosocial support during cancer treatment: a critical yet challenging construct in psychosocial care.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- How consequences of colorectal cancer treatment are managed: a qualitative study of stakeholder experiences about supportive care and current practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Effect of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education on psychological distress and quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- Resilience in adults with colorectal cancer: Refining a conceptual model using a descriptive qualitative approach.Journal of advanced nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeA significant minority of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients experience clinically meaningful distress that may warrant intervention. The goal of this systematic review was to assess the impact of psychosocial interventions on quality-of-life and psychosocial outcomes for CRC patients.
methodsA systematic search of CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PsycARTICLES was undertaken to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through October 2016.
resultsFourteen RCTs of psychosocial interventions for CRC patients were identified. Only three of these RCTs showed significant intervention effects on multiple mental health outcomes. These interventions included written and verbal emotional expression, progressive muscle relaxation training, and a self-efficacy enhancing intervention. Eight of the 14 trials, testing a range of psychoeducational and supportive care interventions, produced little to no effects on study outcomes. An evaluation of RCT quality highlighted the need for greater rigor in study methods and reporting.
conclusionA limited evidence base supports the efficacy of psychosocial interventions for CRC patients. Large-scale trials are needed before drawing definitive conclusions regarding intervention impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.