Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28433605›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology2017

Stability of patient-specific features of altered DNA replication timing in xenografts of primary human acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Takayo Sasaki, Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia, Daniel Vera, Jared Zimmerman, Sunny Das, Michelle Padget, Naoto Nakamichi, Bill H Chang, Jeff Tyner, Brian J Druker and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PARTAGE: Parallel analysis of replication timing and gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimized Repli-seq: improved DNA replication timing analysis by next-generation sequencing.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Article
  11. Control of DNA replication timing in the 3D genome.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Replication timing and nuclear structure.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takayo SasakiDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Juan Carlos Rivera-MuliaDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Daniel VeraCenter for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Jared ZimmermanDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Sunny DasDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
Michelle PadgetDepartments of Pediatrics and Physiology, Center for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Naoto NakamichiTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bill H ChangDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, and OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Jeff TynerDepartment of Cell, Development, and Cancer Biology, and OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Brian J DrukerDepartment of Cell, Development, and Cancer Biology, and OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD.
Andrew P WengTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Curt I CivinDepartments of Pediatrics and Physiology, Center for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Connie J EavesTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency Vancouver, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
David M GilbertDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL; Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL. Electronic address: gilbert@bio.fsu.edu.
Florida State University · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING MECHANISMS OF hESC SELF-RENEWAL AND CELL FATE COMMITMENTP01GM085354 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI DALTON, STEPHEN · 2008 to 2018
$18.3M
Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
Replication Profiling as a Diagnostic Tool in B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaR21CA161666 · NCI · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GILBERT, DAVID M · 2013 to 2014
$341k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA161666NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM085354NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide DNA replication timing (RT) profiles reflect the global three-dimensional chromosome architecture of cells. They also provide a comprehensive and unique megabase-scale picture of cellular epigenetic state. Thus, normal differentiation involves reproducible changes in RT, and transformation generally perturbs these, although the potential effects of altered RT on the properties of transformed cells remain largely unknown. A major challenge to interrogating these issues in human acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) is the low proliferative activity of most of the cells, which may be further reduced in cryopreserved samples and difficult to overcome in vitro. In contrast, the ability of many human ALL cell populations to expand when transplanted into highly immunodeficient mice is well documented. To examine the stability of DNA RT profiles of serially passaged xenografts of primary human B- and T-ALL cells, we first devised a method that circumvents the need for bromodeoxyuridine incorporation to distinguish early versus late S-phase cells. Using this and more standard protocols, we found consistently strong retention in xenografts of the original patient-specific RT features. Moreover, in a case in which genomic analyses indicated changing subclonal dynamics in serial passages, the RT profiles tracked concordantly. These results indicate that DNA RT is a relatively stable feature of human ALLs propagated in immunodeficient mice. In addition, they suggest the power of this approach for future interrogation of the origin and consequences of altered DNA RT in ALL.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationDNA ReplicationNeoplasm TransplantationAnimalsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHeterograftsHumansMaleMice, Inbred NODMice, KnockoutMice, SCIDPrecursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaPrecursor T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID28433605
PMCPMC5491210
OpenAlexW2606226990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.