Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28433467›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2017

Modeling hypohedonia following repeated social defeat: Individual vulnerability and dopaminergic involvement.

Samantha R Spierling, Maegan Mattock, Eric P Zorrilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Central amygdalaNeurobiology of stress · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Stress, associative learning, and decision-making.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Making Sense of Rodent Models of Anhedonia.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha R SpierlingCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: samspier@scripps.edu.
Maegan MattockCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA, USA.
Eric P ZorrillaCommittee on the Neurobiology of Addictive Disorders, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Rd., La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: ezorrilla@scripps.edu.

Funding

TARGETED DISRUPTION OF NEUROENDOCRINE GENESP01DK026741 · NIDDK · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ZORRILLA, ERIC P, ZORRILLA, ERIC P · 1986 to 2014
$31.6M
SYSTEMIC NEUROPHARMACOLOGYP50AA006420 · NIAAA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI KOOB, GEORGE F · 1985 to 2002
$5.1M
Role of the CRF2 Receptor in Ingestive BehaviorR03DK064871 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ZORRILLA, ERIC P. · 2003 to 2005
$563k
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA006420NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK026741NIDDK NIH HHS R03 DK064871
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social defeat in rodents putatively can model hypohedonia. The present studies examined models for assessing hypohedonia-like behavior and tested the hypotheses that 1) individual differences in baseline reward sensitivity predict vulnerability, and 2) defeat elicits changes in pharmacological measures of striatal dopaminergic function. Male Wistar rats (n=142) received repeated defeat (3 "triad" blocks of 3 defeats) or control handling. To determine whether defeat influenced consumption of SuperSac (glucose-saccharin) over an isocaloric, less preferred, glucose solution, a 2-choice paradigm was used. To determine repeated defeat effects on the reinforcing efficacy of SuperSac, a progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement was used. Amphetamine-induced locomotor activity (0.08mg/kg, s.c.) was determined as a measure sensitive to striatal dopaminergic function. Defeat reduced SuperSac consumption during the first two triads-an effect seen in the third triad only in defeated rats with High vs. Low baseline SuperSac intake. The characteristic escalation in PR breakpoint for SuperSac normally seen in controls was absent in defeated rats, leading to a significant difference by the third triad. Defeat-induced blunting of the escalation in PR performance was greater in rats with High antecedent PR breakpoints and persisted 2.5weeks post-defeat. Repeated defeat also blunted amphetamine-induced locomotion 13days post-defeat. Thus, hypohedonic-like effects of social defeat were detected and accompanied by persistently attenuated striatal dopamine function. Early effects were seen for consumption of differentially-palatable solutions, and persistent effects were seen for the "breakpoint" motivational measure. The results implicate initial reward sensitivity as a risk factor for stress-induced hypohedonia.

Indexed as

Dominance-SubordinationResilience, PsychologicalRewardAmphetamineAnhedoniaAnimalsChoice BehaviorDopamineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsGlucoseMaleMotivationMotor ActivityRats, WistarSaccharinAmphetamineDopamineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsGlucoseSaccharinAmphetamine or dopamine reuptake inhibitor or dopaminergicAnhedonia or anhedonic or hypohedonia or rewardMajor depression or depressive or depressedMotivation or volition or avolitionRepeated or chronic defeat or social stressSugar or glucose or saccharin or SuperSac

Identifiers

PMID28433467
PMCPMC5524559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.