Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28433407›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2017

Patient-provider communication in nephrology care for adolescents and young adults.

S S Coburn, M N Eakin, D Roter, C Pruette, T Brady, S Mendley, S Tuchman, B Fivush, K A Riekert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bridging the Gap: Assessing Nephrology Transition Practices in Pediatric and Adult Medical Centers.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Promoting High-Quality Health Communication Between Young Adults With Diabetes and Health Care Providers.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

S S CoburnThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: scoburn@childrensnational.org.
M N EakinThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
D RoterThe Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
C PruetteThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
T BradyThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
S MendleyThe University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
S TuchmanChildren's National Health System, Washington, D.C., USA.
B FivushThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
K A RiekertThe Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USChildren's National · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Doctor-Teen Communication & Antihypertensive Adherence in Chronic Kidney DiseaseR01DK092919 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RIEKERT, KRISTIN A · 2011 to 2016
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK092919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the relative quantity of talk between providers, caregivers, and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and how communication differs by age.

methodsDuring nephrology clinic visits, conversations between AYAs with CKD (N=99, ages 11-20, median=15), their caregivers, and providers (N=19) were audiotaped and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Linear mixed models tested AYA age differences in talk frequency by AYAs, caregivers, and providers. Post-hoc analyses tested differences in talk using AYA age groups.

resultsDuring clinic visits, providers spoke the most (63.7%), and caregivers spoke more (22.6%) than AYAs (13.7%). Overall talk differed by AYA age in AYAs (p<0.001) and caregivers (p<0.05), but not providers. Higher AYA age was associated with more AYA talk (biomedical information-giving, partnering, rapport-oriented) and less caregiver biomedical information-giving (ps<0.001-0.05). In post-hoc analyses, young adults talked more than adolescents; caregiver talk decreased in the middle-adolescent group.

conclusionsIncreases in AYA talk occur primarily in young adulthood, whereas caregiver talk decreases in middle adolescence. This may indicate an appropriate developmental shift but raises concerns about conversational gaps during middle-adolescence. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: During transition-oriented treatment planning, providers should engage both AYAs and caregivers to avoid potential gaps in communication.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdolescentAdultCaregiversChildHumansMaleNephrologyPatient-Centered CarePatient ParticipationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicTape RecordingUnited StatesYoung AdultAdolescentsCaregiversChronic kidney diseaseNephrologyPatient-provider communicationPediatricSubspecialtyTransitionYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID28433407
PMCPMC6476325
OpenAlexW2598008403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.