ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2017
An acetone-based phantom for quantitative diffusion MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A diffusion-prepared reduced FOV sequence for prostate MRI near metallic implants.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Motion-robust, blood-suppressed, reduced-distortion diffusion MRI of the liver.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Volumetric and multispectral DWI near metallic implants using a non-linear phase Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill diffusion preparation.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Quantitative diffusion MRI of the abdomen and pelvis.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Optimized Diffusion-Weighting Gradient Waveform Design (ODGD) formulation for motion compensation and concomitant gradient nulling.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Stimulated echo based mapping (STEM) of TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2019Article
- Physical and numerical phantoms for the validation of brain microstructural MRI: A cookbook.NeuroImage · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo propose and evaluate an acetone-D MATERIALS AND
methodsThe proposed acetone-D
resultsWhen placed in an ice-water bath, all phantoms provided desirable signal properties, including single-peak signal with Gaussian diffusion and tunable ADC. At 0°C, however, water-based phantoms had ADC limited to less than 1.1·10
conclusionThe proposed acetone-D LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1683-1692.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.