Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28432696›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of dermatology2017

Systematic review of self-management interventions for people with eczema.

M J Ridd, A J L King, E Le Roux, A Waldecker, A L Huntley

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Supporting families managing childhood eczema: developing and optimising eczema care online using qualitative research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Cost-effectiveness of two online interventions supporting self-care for eczema for parents/carers and young people.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Online behavioural interventions for children and young people with eczema: a quantitative evaluation.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NOBMC public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The content and conduct of GP consultations for dermatology problems: a cross-sectional study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M J RiddSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7954-8823
A J L KingSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
E Le RouxSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
A WaldeckerSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
A L HuntleySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26018Department of Health PDF-2014-07-013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eczema is a common long-term condition, but inadequate support and information can lead to poor adherence and treatment failure. We have reviewed the international literature of interventions designed to promote self-management in adults and children with eczema. MEDLINE, MEDLINE in process, Embase, CINAHL and the Global Resource for EczemA Trials database were searched from their inception to August 2016, for randomized controlled trials. Two authors independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed risk of bias for all included studies and extracted data. Twenty studies (3028 participants) conducted in 11 different countries were included. The majority (n = 18) were based in secondary care and most (n = 16) targeted children with eczema. Reporting of studies, including descriptions of the interventions and the outcomes themselves, was generally poor. Thirteen studies were face-to-face educational interventions, five were delivered online and two were studies of written action plans. Follow-up in most studies (n = 12) was short term (up to 12 weeks). Only six trials specified a single primary outcome. There was limited evidence of effectiveness. Only three studies collected and reported outcomes related to cost and just one study undertook any formal cost-effectiveness analysis. In summary, we have identified a general absence of well-conducted and well-reported randomized controlled trials with a strong theoretical basis. Therefore, there is still uncertainty about how best to support self-management of eczema in a clinically effective and cost-effective way. Recommendations on design and conduct of future trials are presented.

Indexed as

AdultChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEczemaHumansInternetPatient Education as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf-ManagementTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28432696
PMCPMC5637890
OpenAlexW2606641667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.