ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2017
Collisional Cross-Sections with T-Wave Ion Mobility Spectrometry without Experimental Calibration.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Conformation-Specific Approach to Native Top-down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- Modeling collisional kinetic energy damping, heating, and cooling of ions in mass spectrometers: a tutorial perspective.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2024Article
- Accurate Collisional Cross Section Measurement by Multipass Cyclic Ion Mobility Spectrometry.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Determining Collisional Cross Sections from Ion Decay with Individual Ion Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- Effect of Traveling Waveform Profiles on Collision Cross Section Measurements in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2022Article
- Experimental Determination of Activation Energies for Covalent Bond Formation via Ion/Ion Reactions and Competing Processes.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Waveform Profiles for Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Separations in Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021Article
- Collision Cross Sections of Charge-Reduced Proteins and Protein Complexes: A Database for Collision Cross Section Calibration.Analytical chemistry · 2020Article
- A Semi-Empirical Framework for Interpreting Traveling Wave Ion Mobility Arrival Time Distributions.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2019Review
- Experimental and theoretical investigation of overall energy deposition in surface-induced unfolding of protein ions.Chemical science · 2019Article
- The Role of Mass Spectrometry in Structural Studies of Flavin-Based Electron Bifurcating Enzymes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A method for relating traveling-wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS) drift times with collisional cross-sections using computational simulations is presented. This method is developed using SIMION modeling of the TWIMS potential wave and equations that describe the velocity of ions in gases induced by electric fields. The accuracy of this method is assessed by comparing the collisional cross-sections of 70 different reference ions obtained using this method with those obtained from static drift tube ion mobility measurements. The cross-sections obtained here with low wave velocities are very similar to those obtained using static drift (average difference = 0.3%) for ions formed from both denaturing and buffered aqueous solutions. In contrast, the cross-sections obtained with high wave velocities are significantly greater, especially for ions formed from buffered aqueous solutions. These higher cross-sections at high wave velocities may result from high-order factors not accounted for in the model presented here or from the protein ions unfolding during TWIMS. Results from this study demonstrate that collisional cross-sections can be obtained from single TWIMS drift time measurements, but that low wave velocities and gentle instrument conditions should be used in order to minimize any uncertainties resulting from high-order effects not accounted for in the present model and from any protein unfolding that might occur. Thus, the method presented here eliminates the need to calibrate TWIMS drift times with collisional cross-sections measured using other ion mobility devices. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.