Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28432639›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2018

Measuring patient experience in dialysis: a new paradigm of quality assessment.

Connie M Rhee, Steven M Brunelli, Lalita Subramanian, Francesca Tentori

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Measuring patients' experience with renal services in the UK: development and validation of the Kidney PREM.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dialysis Prescription and Sudden Death.Seminars in nephrology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Connie M RheeUniversity of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA.
Steven M BrunelliDaVita Clinical Research, 825 South 8th Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55404, USA. steven.brunelli@davita.com.
Lalita SubramanianArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Francesca TentoriArbor Research Collaborative for Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS K23-DK102903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' experience of care (PEC) is as an important dimension in quality of care. As a distinct entity from patient satisfaction and patient health-related quality of life, PEC is defined as patients' perceptions of the range of interactions they have with the health care system, including care from providers, facilities, and health plans. While traditionally PEC may be ascertained via informal assessments, in recent years, especially in the United States, there has been a shift towards standardized surveillance of PEC amongst dialysis patients in order to: (1) set a normative expectation regarding the importance of PEC; (2) standardize the components of patients' experience that are assessed to minimize potential "blind spots"; (3) provide a direct "voice" to the patient in communicating perceptions of their care; (4) facilitate comparisons of quality across facilities; and (5) broaden accountability for PEC to the entire multidisciplinary dialysis care team. In this review, we will discuss the significance of PEC as a quality of care metric in dialysis patients; the history of PEC assessment across other health care arenas; the development of the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems survey as a means to standardize PEC assessment among US dialysis patients; experiences in PEC assessment across international dialysis populations; and future areas of research needed to refine the ascertainment of PEC and its impact upon patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationEmpathyHumansKidney Failure, ChronicNephrologistsPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of LifeRenal DialysisIn-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider and Systems surveyPatients’ experience of carePatients’ perceptions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.