ArticleJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2018
Twofold minimum variance beamforming for enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Article in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fast adaptive beamforming through a cascade structure for ultrasound imaging.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo calculate the optimal weights of a minimum variance (MV) beamformer, the covariance matrix of the received data should be estimated. In ultrasound imaging, it is done through spatial smoothing. However, this technique reduces the effective aperture and consequently limits the attainable resolution. To mitigate this effect, we propose a new configuration for applying an adaptive beamforming method.
methodsThe method is based on applying MV in a twofold configuration such that the outputs of the subarrays are combined through an adaptive MV-like beamformer, instead of simply summing them. In this way, a fully adaptive beamformer is obtained.
resultsApplying the method on a phantom containing point targets has shown that off-axis signals are attenuated more in comparison to MV. This results in a lowered mainlobe width and decreased sidelobe levels. Moreover, simulation results of a cyst phantom confirm the superiority of the method over the MV in terms of contrast.
conclusionThe method yields significant improvement in the resolving capability and the contrast compared with the conventional MV. At the presence of the steering vector errors, these superiorities were achieved at a cost of slightly more errors in estimating the reflectivity coefficients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28432447What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.