Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28432419›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2017

[Driving and dementia : An issue for general practice?!]

Verena Leve, Katharina Ilse, Marie Ufert, Stefan Wilm, Michael Pentzek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Fitness to drive and chronic eye diseases].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verena LeveInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. verena.leve@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4545-1716
Katharina IlseInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Marie UfertInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Stefan WilmInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Michael PentzekInstitut für Allgemeinmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith most forms of dementia, the risk of road traffic accidents increases with disease progression. Addressing the issue of fitness to drive at an early stage can help to reduce driving-related risks and simultaneously preserve mobility. General practitioners (GPs) are central contact persons for dementia patients and their relatives in medical and psychosocial matters, and also play a key role in addressing the issue of driving safety.

objectiveIdentification of relevant aspects of managing fitness to drive in dementia, as well as of support requirements for German general practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeven focus groups with dementia patients, family caregivers and GPs were conducted in order to define the different requirements for counselling in the general practice setting. The transcribed discussions were analysed by a multiprofessional research team using content analysis.

resultsFor people with dementia, declining mobility and driving cessation is related to a loss of autonomy. Addressing fitness to drive in dementia is thus a subject of conflict and uncertainty for both family caregivers and GPs. The difficulties include the assessment of fitness to drive in the general practice setting, concerns about compromising the patient-physician relationship by raising the issue of driving fitness, as well as uncertainties about the GP's own role. GPs consider the involvement of caregivers to be important to successfully address the topic of driving safety and organise alternative transport. Support is required in the form of criteria defining the time point at which fitness to drive should be assessed, information on compensation possibilities and mobility alternatives.

conclusionResource-oriented and patient-centred development of management strategies for limited mobility is needed in general practice. Finding the correct balance between documentation, adequately informing the patient and establishing patient-centred strategies represents a challenge.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAccidents, TrafficAgedAged, 80 and overAutomobile DrivingDementiaFemaleFocus GroupsGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersGeriatric AssessmentGermanyHumansMalePractice Patterns, Physicians'Driving cessationFamily care giversGeneral practiceMobilityPhysician-patient relationship

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.