Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28432007›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2017

Caloric compensation in preschool children: Relationships with body mass and differences by food category.

S Carnell, L Benson, E L Gibson, L A Mais, S Warkentin

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Dragon Fruit Peel Waste (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Children's eating behaviours and related constructs: conceptual and theoretical foundations and their implications.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. "Food" and "non-food" self-regulation in childhood: a review and reciprocal analysis.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S CarnellDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: susan.carnell@jhmi.edu.
L BensonDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
E L GibsonDepartment of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, UK.
L A MaisDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Discipline of Nutrology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
S WarkentinDivision of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Discipline of Nutrology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

MULTILEVEL SYSTEMS-ORIENTED CHILDHOOD OBESITY STUDY IN CHINAU54HD070725 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GITTELSOHN, JOEL · 2011 to 2016
$15.9M
Neurobehavioral Correlates of Familial/genetic obesity risk in adolescentsR00DK088360 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CARNELL, SUSAN · 2013 to 2015
$731k
Brain activation to food stimuli in obese and lean adolescents with high and lowK99DK088360 · NIDDK · ST. LUKE'S-ROOSEVELT INST FOR HLTH SCIS · PI CARNELL, SUSAN · 2010 to 2011
$178k
Medical Research CouncilNICHD NIH HHS U54 HD070725NIDDK NIH HHS K99 DK088360NIDDK NIH HHS R00 DK088360
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintaining a healthy weight may involve compensating for previously consumed calories at subsequent meals. To test whether heavier children demonstrated poorer caloric compensation across a range of conditions, and to explore whether compensation failure was the result of inadequate adjustment of overall intake or specific over-consumption of highly palatable, high energy-density 'junk' foods, we administered two compensation tests to a sample of 4-5 y olds. For Test A, preloads varied only in carbohydrate content and were organoleptically indistinguishable (200 ml orange-flavored beverage [0 kcal vs. 200 kcal]). For Test B, the preloads varied substantially in both macronutrient composition and learned gustatory cues to caloric content (200 ml water [0 kcal] vs. 200 ml strawberry milkshake [200 kcal]). Each preload was followed 30 min later by a multi-item ad-libitum meal containing junk foods (chocolate cookies, cheese-flavored crackers) and core foods (fruits and vegetables, bread rolls, protein foods). Testing took place at the children's own school under normal lunch-time conditions. Children were weighed and measured. Caloric compensation occurred in both tests, in terms of total, junk and core food intake (RMANOVA, all p < 0.01). Higher BMI z scores were associated with greater average caloric compensation (r = -0.26; p < 0.05), such that overweight/obese children showed least compensation (41%), children over the 50

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, HealthyEnergy IntakeFood PreferencesPatient ComplianceBody Mass IndexChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorFast FoodsFemaleFood ServicesFruitHumansLondonAdiposityBody weightFatnessFood choiceHigh calorie

Identifiers

PMID28432007
PMCPMC5500240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.