Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28431988›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2017

Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities.

Willi Horner-Johnson, Frances M Biel, Blair G Darney, Aaron B Caughey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Medical indications for primary cesarean delivery in women with and without disabilities.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Willi Horner-JohnsonInstitute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: hornerjo@ohsu.edu.
Frances M BielDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Blair G DarneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; National Institute of Public Health, Center for Health Systems Research, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Aaron B CaugheyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
Prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with disabilitiesR21HD081309 · NICHD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HORNER-JOHNSON, WILLI · 2014 to 2015
$419k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD081309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough it is likely that childbearing among women with disabilities is increasing, no empirical data have been published on changes over time in the numbers of women with disabilities giving birth. Further, while it is known that women with disabilities are at increased risk of cesarean delivery, temporal trends in cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities have not been examined.

objectiveTo assess time trends in births by any mode and in primary cesarean deliveries among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual/developmental disabilities.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked vital records and hospital discharge data from all deliveries in California, 2000-2010 (n = 4,605,061). We identified women with potential disabilities using ICD-9 codes. We used descriptive statistics and visualizations to examine time patterns. Logistic regression analyses assessed the association between disability and primary cesarean delivery, stratified by year.

resultsAmong all women giving birth, the proportion with a disability increased from 0.27% in 2000 to 0.80% in 2010. Women with disabilities had significantly elevated odds of primary cesarean delivery in each year, but the magnitude of the odds ratio decreased over time from 2.60 (95% CI = 2.25 = 2.99) in 2000 to 1.66 (95% CI = 1.51-1.81) in 2010.

conclusionAdequate clinician training is needed to address the perinatal care needs of the increasing numbers of women with disabilities giving birth. Continued efforts to understand cesarean delivery patterns and reasons for cesarean deliveries may help guide further reductions in proportions of cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities relative to women without disabilities.

Indexed as

ParturitionAdultCaliforniaCesarean SectionCohort StudiesDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyRetrospective StudiesTimeBirthCesareanHospital discharge dataPeople with disabilitiesTime trends

Identifiers

PMID28431988
PMCPMC5544013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.