ArticleAtencion primaria2018
[Dependent relative: Effects on family health].
Article in Atencion primaria, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- [The perspective of caregivers from a gender analysis.]Revista espanola de salud publica · 2023Article
- [Evaluation of the effectiveness of an intervention program in family caregivers of dependent persons, in the primary health care system].Atencion primaria · 2021Article
- [Risk of dependence and self-esteem in elderly people according to physical activity and drug consumption].Revista espanola de salud publica · 2020Article
- Benefits of Older Volunteering on Wellbeing: An International Comparison.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Care and functional disabilities in daily activities - ELSI-Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objetivesThe purpose of this work is to analyse the effects on informal caregiver's health and lifestyle when living with a dependent person at home. A comparison will be made between this situation and other situations involving commitment of time and energy, taking into account gender and age differences in each stage of the life cycle.
designCross-sectional study analysing secondary data.
settingThe method used for collecting information is the computer assisted personal interview carried out in selected homes by the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality.
participantsThe study included 19,351 participants aged over 25 years who completed the 2011-2012 Spanish National Health Survey. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: This research is based on demographic information obtained from a Spanish National Health Survey (2011/12). Using an empirical framework, the Logit model was select and the data reported as odds ratio. The estimations were repeated independently by sub-groups of age and gender.
resultsThe study showed that the health of people who share their lives with a dependent person is worse than those who do not have any dependent person at home (they are 5 times at higher risk of developing health problems). The study found that being a woman, advance age, low educational level and does not work, also has an influence. Being a caregiver reduces the likelihood of maintaining a healthy lifestyle through physical exercise, relaxation, or eating a balanced diet.
conclusionsLiving with a dependent person reduces the likelihood of maintaining healthy lifestyles and worsens the state of health of family members. Significant differences in gender and age were found.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.