Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28431436›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

Enhanced Tearing by Electrical Stimulation of the Anterior Ethmoid Nerve.

Mark Brinton, Andrea L Kossler, Zara M Patel, James Loudin, Manfred Franke, Christopher N Ta, Daniel Palanker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Electrotherapy in the management of neuropathic corneal pain: narrative review.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How Eyelid Changes May Impact on Tears.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stimulating Tear Production: Spotlight on Neurostimulation.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Novel current and future therapy options for treatment of dry eye disease].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark BrintonElectrical Engineering Department, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Andrea L KosslerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Zara M PatelOtolaryngology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
James LoudinHansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Manfred FrankeIndependent Consultant, Neuronoff.com, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Christopher N TaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Daniel PalankerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States 4Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Electronic Stimulator of Lacrimal GlandR01EY023259 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V · 2013 to 2015
$1.4M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Electrical neurostimulation enhances tear secretion, and can be applied to treatment of dry eye disease. Using a chronic implant, we evaluate the effects of stimulating the anterior ethmoid nerve on the aqueous, lipid, and protein content of secreted tears. Methods: Neurostimulators were implanted beneath the nasal mucosa in 13 New Zealand white rabbits. Stimulations (2.3-2.8 mA pulses of 75-875 μs in duration repeated at 30-100 Hz for 3 minutes) were performed daily, for 3 weeks to measure changes in tear volume (Schirmer test), osmolarity (TearLab osmometer), lipid (Oil-Red-O staining), and protein (BCA assay, mass spectrometry). Results: Stimulation of the anterior ethmoid nerve in the frequency range of 30 to 90 Hz increased tear volume by 92% to 133% (P ≤ 0.01). Modulating the treatment with 50% duty cycle (3 seconds of stimulation repeated every 6 seconds) increased tear secretion an additional 23% above continuous stimulation (P ≤ 0.01). Tear secretion returned to baseline levels within 7 minutes after stimulation ended. Tear film osmolarity decreased by 7 mOsmol/L, tear lipid increased by 24% to 36% and protein concentration increased by 48% (P ≤ 0.05). Relative abundance of the lacrimal gland proteins remained the same, while several serum and corneal proteins decreased with stimulation (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: Electrical stimulation of the anterior ethmoid nerve increased aqueous tear volume, reduced tear osmolarity, added lipid, and increased the concentration of normal tear proteins. Human studies with an intranasal stimulator should verify these effects in patients with aqueous- and lipid-deficient forms of dry eye disease.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDry Eye SyndromesElectric Stimulation TherapyLacrimal ApparatusMalePeripheral NervesRabbitsTears

Identifiers

PMID28431436
PMCPMC5398789
OpenAlexW2605592441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.