Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28431275›Full record

ArticleMedical image analysis2017

Learning Non-rigid Deformations for Robust, Constrained Point-based Registration in Image-Guided MR-TRUS Prostate Intervention.

John A Onofrey, Lawrence H Staib, Saradwata Sarkar, Rajesh Venkataraman, Cayce B Nawaf, Preston C Sprenkle, Xenophon Papademetris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical image analysis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A OnofreyDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, USA. Electronic address: john.onofrey@yale.edu.
Lawrence H StaibDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, USA; Department of Electrical Engineering, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, USA. Electronic address: lawrence.staib@yale.edu.
Saradwata SarkarEigen, Grass Valley, California, USA. Electronic address: sarad.sarkar@eigen.com.
Rajesh VenkataramanEigen, Grass Valley, California, USA. Electronic address: rajesh.venkataraman@eigen.com.
Cayce B NawafDepartment of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: cayce.nawaf@yale.edu.
Preston C SprenkleDepartment of Urology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. Electronic address: preston.sprenkle@yale.edu.
Xenophon PapademetrisDepartment of Radiology & Biomedical Imaging, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, USA. Electronic address: xenophon.papademetris@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Intra-procedure Deformable Ultrasound-MRI Fusion for Prostate BiopsiesR42CA186414 · NCI · ZMK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, D/B/A EIGEN · PI PAPADEMETRIS, XENOPHON · 2016 to 2017
$1.0M
Intra-procedure Deformable Ultrasound-MRI Fusion for Prostate BiopsiesR41CA186414 · NCI · ZMK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, D/B/A EIGEN · PI PAPADEMETRIS, XENOPHON · 2014 to 2014
$225k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCI NIH HHS R41 CA186414NCI NIH HHS R42 CA186414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and robust non-rigid registration of pre-procedure magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to intra-procedure trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) is critical for image-guided biopsies of prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the United States. TRUS-guided biopsy is the current clinical standard for prostate cancer diagnosis and assessment. State-of-the-art, clinical MR-TRUS image fusion relies upon semi-automated segmentations of the prostate in both the MR and the TRUS images to perform non-rigid surface-based registration of the gland. Segmentation of the prostate in TRUS imaging is itself a challenging task and prone to high variability. These segmentation errors can lead to poor registration and subsequently poor localization of biopsy targets, which may result in false-negative cancer detection. In this paper, we present a non-rigid surface registration approach to MR-TRUS fusion based on a statistical deformation model (SDM) of intra-procedural deformations derived from clinical training data. Synthetic validation experiments quantifying registration volume of interest overlaps of the PI-RADS parcellation standard and tests using clinical landmark data demonstrate that our use of an SDM for registration, with median target registration error of 2.98 mm, is significantly more accurate than the current clinical method. Furthermore, we show that the low-dimensional SDM registration results are robust to segmentation errors that are not uncommon in clinical TRUS data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansImage-Guided BiopsyImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, AutomatedProstateProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonographyDimensionality reductionImage-guided biopsyMagnetic resonance imagingNon-rigid registrationProstateStatistical deformation modelTrans-rectal ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID28431275
PMCPMC5514316
OpenAlexW2606057727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.