Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28431152›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2017

Insights into the Existence of Isomeric Plastomes in Cupressoideae (Cupressaceae).

Xiao-Jian Qu, Chung-Shien Wu, Shu-Miaw Chaw, Ting-Shuang Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lectotypification ofPhytoKeys · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Plastome Phylogenomic and Biogeographical Study onBioMed research international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiao-Jian QuGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.
Chung-Shien WuBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shu-Miaw ChawBiodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ting-Shuang YiGermplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cypress family (Cupressaceae) possesses highly rearranged plastomes that lack a pair of large inverted repeats typically found in land plants. A few cypress species have been reported to contain isomeric plastomes, but whether the existence of isomeric plastomes is ubiquitous in the family remains to be investigated with a broader taxon sampling. In this study, we sequenced the complete plastomes of ten species in Cupressoideae, the largest cypress subfamily. Cupressoideae showed relatively accelerated rates of substitutions at both nonsynonymous and synonymous sites as compared with other subfamilies of Cupressaceae. Our PCR and read mapping analyses together suggested the existence of isomeric plastomes in eight of the ten sequenced Cupressoideae species. The isomeric plastomes were also detected in 176 individuals from nine wild populations of four Cupressoideae species. Within Calocedrus macrolepis, we discovered a new type of isomeric plastomes that was likely derived from homologous recombination mediated by an 11-bp repeat. We conclude that isomeric plastomes are commonly present in Cupressoideae, thereby contributing to increased plastomic complexity.

Indexed as

CupressaceaeCupressoideaeisomeric plastomesplastomic complexityrepeat

Identifiers

PMID28431152
PMCPMC5408090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.