ArticleEuropean heart journal2017
Prediction of adverse events after catheter-based procedures in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease in the IMPACT registry.
Article in European heart journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Major Adverse Events of Cardiac Catheterization in Pediatric Cardiomyopathy: Insights From the IMPACT Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Using Quality Improvement to Optimize Blood Product Utilization in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.Pediatric cardiology · 2025Article
- PICS/AEPC/APPCS/CSANZ/SCAI/SOLACI: Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiac Catheterization for Pediatric Patients and Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Article
- A Risk Prediction Model of Serious Adverse Events After Cardiac Catheterization for Chinese Adults Patients with Moderate and Severe Congenital Heart Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Thromboembolic complications in adult congenital heart disease: the knowns and the unknowns.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021Review
- Upper body peripherally inserted central catheter in pediatric single ventricle patients.World journal of cardiology · 2020Article
- Variation in Anticoagulation Practices in the Congenital Cardiac Catheterization Lab: Results of a Multinational PICES Survey.Pediatric cardiology · 2019Article
- Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes of Transcatheter Interventions for Aortic Coarctation: A Report From the IMPACT Registry.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & InterventionsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsWe sought to identify factors associated with major adverse events (MAE) after cardiac catheterization in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), and create the first model to individualize risk discussions in this growing population. METHODS AND
resultsImproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment (IMPACT), a National Cardiovascular Data Registry, contains congenital catheterization data from over 87 hospitals in the United States. Demographics, pre-procedure, and procedural variables were collected for patients over age 10. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of MAE, a composite of death, urgent surgery or procedure due to a catheterization complication, transfusion, embolic stroke, tamponade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ventricular assist device placement, and device embolization, malposition or thrombosis requiring surgical intervention. A risk score was built based on the effect sizes of each predictor and validated in a split sample. A MAE occurred in 686 (2.5%) of the 27 293 index procedures meeting inclusion criteria. The independent multivariate predictors of MAE were older age, pre-procedural anticoagulation use, renal disease, lower haemoglobin, lower oxygen saturation, non-elective procedure, higher index procedure risk and having had no prior cardiac procedures. Being underweight or overweight had borderline significance and was added to the model. The C-statistic for the model was robust at 0.787 in the derivation and 0.773 in the validation cohort.
conclusionThe factors predicting adverse events after cardiac catheterization in adolescents and adults with CHD are different than in the general population. Validation of this model in other national or multi-institutional datasets is the next step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.