Trial reportJAMA internal medicine2017
Effect of a Price Transparency Intervention in the Electronic Health Record on Clinician Ordering of Inpatient Laboratory Tests: The PRICE Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Charge Displays on Inpatient Laboratory Test Ordering
Improving Utilization of Supplemental Breast MRI Screening for Women With Extremely Dense Breasts
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of non-interruptive nudge interventions in electronic health records to improve the delivery of care in hospitals: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of provider price display in computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on healthcare quality: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- Displaying Cost and Completion Time for Reference Laboratory Test Orders-A Randomized Controlled Trial.Applied clinical informatics · 2022Trial
- Effect of a Default Order vs an Alert in the Electronic Health Record on Hepatitis C Virus Screening Among Hospitalized Patients: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- Effect of Social Comparison Feedback on Laboratory Test Ordering for Hospitalized Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of general internal medicine · 2018Trial
- Price Transparency and Patient Empowerment.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- A Machine Learning-Based Guide for Repeated Laboratory Testing in Pediatric Emergency Departments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ultrasonic renal length as an indicator of renal fibrosis severity in non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2025Article
- Reporting of costs and economic impacts in randomized trials of de-implementation interventions for low-value care: a systematic scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2023Article
- Effects of Real-time Prescription Benefit Recommendations on Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2022Article
- If Patients Don't Use Available Health Service Pricing Information, Is Transparency Still Important?AMA journal of ethics · 2022Article
- Specific test panels for patients with heart failure: implementation and use in the Spanish National Health System.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- Effect of a price display intervention on laboratory test ordering behavior of general practitioners.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Testing Practices, Interpretation, and Diagnostic Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Anemia by US Primary Care Physicians.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Nudging healthcare professionals in clinical settings: a scoping review of the literature.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Reducing Blood Loss by Changing to Small Volume Tubes for Laboratory Testing.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2021Article
- Patient-reported financial toxicity, quality of life, and health behaviors in insured US cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Many health systems are considering increasing price transparency at the time of order entry. However, evidence of its impact on clinician ordering behavior is inconsistent and limited to single-site evaluations of shorter duration. Objective: To test the effect of displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests on clinician ordering behavior over 1 year. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Pragmatic Randomized Introduction of Cost data through the electronic health record (PRICE) trial was a randomized clinical trial comparing a 1-year intervention to a 1-year preintervention period, and adjusting for time trends and patient characteristics. The trial took place at 3 hospitals in Philadelphia between April 2014 and April 2016 and included 98 529 patients comprising 142 921 hospital admissions. Interventions: Inpatient laboratory test groups were randomly assigned to display Medicare allowable fees (30 in intervention) or not (30 in control) in the electronic health record. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was the number of tests ordered per patient-day. Secondary outcomes were tests performed per patient-day and Medicare associated fees. Results: The sample included 142 921 hospital admissions representing patients who were 51.9% white (74 165), 38.9% black (55 526), and 56.9% female (81 291) with a mean (SD) age of 54.7 (19.0) years. Preintervention trends of order rates among the intervention and control groups were similar. In adjusted analyses of the intervention group compared with the control group over time, there were no significant changes in overall test ordering behavior (0.05 tests ordered per patient-day; 95% CI, -0.002 to 0.09; P = .06) or associated fees ($0.24 per patient-day; 95% CI, -$0.42 to $0.91; P = .47). Exploratory subset analyses found small but significant differences in tests ordered per patient-day based on patient intensive care unit (ICU) stay (patients with ICU stay: -0.16; 95% CI, -0.31 to -0.01; P = .04; patients without ICU stay: 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08-0.17; P < .001) and the magnitude of associated fees (top quartile of tests based on fee value: -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to -0.01; P = .04; bottom quartile: 0.03; 95% CI, 0.002-0.06; P = .04). Adjusted analyses of tests that were performed found a small but significant overall increase in the intervention group relative to the control group over time (0.08 tests performed per patient day, 95% CI, 0.03-0.12; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Displaying Medicare allowable fees for inpatient laboratory tests did not lead to a significant change in overall clinician ordering behavior or associated fees. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02355496.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.