ArticleUrologia
Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of ZSI 475 Penile Prosthesis.
Article in Urologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Removal rate and mechanical failure in penile prosthesis implantation: A systematic review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Pooled it
- Update on penile prosthesis.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
- Risk factors for reoperation of inflatable penile prosthesis among an ethnically diverse urban population in a high-volume center.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.Asian journal of andrology · 2024Review
- Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- History of penile implants: from implants made of bone to modern inflatable penile implants.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- A pilot study of inflatable penile prosthesis placement in transgender neophallus using TutoplastTranslational andrology and urology · 2023Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Review
- Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Initial experience of a single center with the use of ZSI 475 penile prosthesis.Asian journal of urology · 2021Article
- Future considerations in prosthetic urology.Asian journal of andrologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to demonstrate safety and efficacy of ZSI 475 hydraulic penile prosthesis three components. Preparation, procedure and functional results are similar to AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan. This study was conducted from September 2012 to December 2016. PATIENTS AND
methodFrom September 2012 to December 2016, 29 ZSI 475 hydraulic penile prostheses three components were implanted by six surgeons in 28 patients in five European centres. Mean age of patients was 60 years old (44-75). Standard peno-scrotal incision procedure was performed for the 28 patients. Erectile function was assessed by IIEF-5 self-administered questionnaire.
resultsMedian follow-up was 35.11 months (8-47). Postoperative complications were limited to scrotal pump torsion that required a revision, an armed tubing breakage and a scrotal haematoma. At the end of follow-up, 100% of patients had a functional prosthesis and 92.86% were satisfied.
conclusionsImplantation, risks of complications, functional outcome and patient satisfaction with penile implant ZSI 475 are similar to standard hydraulic penile implants three components as AMS 700 and Coloplast Titan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.