Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28430042›Full record

ReviewJournal of cognitive neuroscience2017

Control without Controllers: Toward a Distributed Neuroscience of Executive Control.

Benjamin R Eisenreich, Rei Akaishi, Benjamin Y Hayden

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Heuristics and optimal solutions to the breadth-depth dilemma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. How Do Scientific Views Change? Notes From an Extended Adversarial Collaboration.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benjamin R EisenreichUniversity of Rochester.
Rei AkaishiUniversity of Rochester.
Benjamin Y HaydenUniversity of Rochester.
University of Rochester · US

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE TRAINING IN DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHT32DA007234 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Paul G Mermelstein, Jocelyn M Richard · 1986 to 2026
$10.9M
NEURONAL BASIS OF PERSISTENCER01DA038615 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HAYDEN, BENJAMIN Y · 2015 to 2024
$3.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038615NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Executive control refers to the regulation of cognition and behavior by mental processes and is a hallmark of higher cognition. Most approaches to understanding its mechanisms begin with the assumption that our brains have anatomically segregated and functionally specialized control modules. The modular approach is intuitive: Control is conceptually distinct from basic mental processing, so an organization that reifies that distinction makes sense. An alternative approach sees executive control as self-organizing principles of a distributed organization. In distributed systems, control and controlled processes are colocalized within large numbers of dispersed computational agents. Control then is often an emergent consequence of simple rules governing the interaction between agents. Because these systems are unfamiliar and unintuitive, here we review several well-understood examples of distributed control systems, group living insects and social animals, and emphasize their parallels with neural systems. We then reexamine the cognitive neuroscience literature on executive control for evidence that its neural control systems may be distributed.

Indexed as

Nervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsExecutive FunctionHumansModels, NeurologicalSocial Behavior

Identifiers

PMID28430042
PMCPMC7162733
OpenAlexW2950916425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.