Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429706›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Direct comparison of distinct naive pluripotent states in human embryonic stem cells.

S Warrier, M Van der Jeught, G Duggal, L Tilleman, E Sutherland, J Taelman, M Popovic, S Lierman, S Chuva De Sousa Lopes, A Van Soom and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stem cells and common biomaterials in dentistry: a review study.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unraveling the Spatiotemporal Human Pluripotency in Embryonic Development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

S WarrierDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
M Van der JeughtDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
G DuggalDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
L TillemanDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
E SutherlandDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
J TaelmanDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
M PopovicDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
S LiermanDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
S Chuva De Sousa LopesDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
A Van SoomDepartment of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
L PeelmanDepartment of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
F Van NieuwerburghDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
D I M De ConinckDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
B MentenDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
P MestdaghDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
J Van de SompeleDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Center for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
D DeforceDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Laboratory for Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0635-661X
P De SutterDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
B HeindryckxDepartment for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University Hospital · BEGhent University · BELeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) were shown to exist in a state of primed pluripotency, while mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) display a naive or primed pluripotent state. Here we show the rapid conversion of in-house-derived primed hESCs on mouse embryonic feeder layer (MEF) to a naive state within 5-6 days in naive conversion media (NCM-MEF), 6-10 days in naive human stem cell media (NHSM-MEF) and 14-20 days using the reverse-toggle protocol (RT-MEF). We further observe enhanced unbiased lineage-specific differentiation potential of naive hESCs converted in NCM-MEF, however, all naive hESCs fail to differentiate towards functional cell types. RNA-seq analysis reveals a divergent role of PI3K/AKT/mTORC signalling, specifically of the mTORC2 subunit, in the different naive hESCs. Overall, we demonstrate a direct evaluation of several naive culture conditions performed in the same laboratory, thereby contributing to an unbiased, more in-depth understanding of different naive hESCs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineCulture MediaFeeder CellsHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2MicePhosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesPluripotent Stem CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktSequence Analysis, RNASignal TransductionCulture MediaMechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 2Phosphatidylinositol 3-KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt

Identifiers

PMID28429706
PMCPMC5413953
OpenAlexW2606925983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.