Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429653›Full record

ReviewExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2017

Clinical development of fenretinide as an antineoplastic drug: Pharmacology perspectives.

Jason P Cooper, C Patrick Reynolds, Hwangeui Cho, Min H Kang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The Role of Ceramide and Sphingolipid Metabolism in Cancer Therapeutics.Journal of oncology research and therapy · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antitumoral Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Targeting macrophagic 17Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Fenretinide in Cancer and Neurological Disease: A Two-Face Janus Molecule.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason P Cooper1 Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
C Patrick Reynolds1 Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Hwangeui Cho1 Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Min H Kang1 Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Texas Tech University · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacogenomics for 13-cis retinoic acid in neuroblastomaR01CA168699 · NCI · TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIS CENTER · PI KANG, MIN HEE · 2013 to 2016
$844k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fenretinide (4-HPR) is a synthetic retinoid that has cytotoxic activity against cancer cells. Despite substantial in vitro cytotoxicity, response rates in early clinical trials with 4-HPR have been less than anticipated, likely due to the low bioavailability of the initial oral capsule formulation. Several clinical studies have shown that the oral capsule formulation at maximum tolerated dose (MTD) achieved <10 µmol/L concentrations in patients. To improve bioavailability of 4-HPR, new oral powder (LYM-X-SORB®, LXS) and intravenous lipid emulsion (ILE) formulations are being tested in early-phase clinical trials. ILE 4-HPR administered as five-day continuous infusion achieved over 50 µmol/L at MTD with minimal systemic toxicities; multiple complete and partial responses were observed in peripheral T cell lymphomas. The LXS oral powder 4-HPR formulation increased plasma levels approximately two-fold at MTD in children without dose-limiting toxicities and demonstrated multiple complete responses in recurrent neuroblastoma. The clinical activity observed with new 4-HPR formulations is attributed to increased bioavailability. Phase I and II clinical trials of both LXS 4-HPR and ILE 4-HPR are in progress as a single agent or in combination with other drugs. Impact statement One of the critical components in drug development is understanding pharmacology (especially pharmacokinetics) of the drugs being developed. Often the pharmacokinetic properties, such as poor solubility leading to poor bioavailability, of the drug can limit further development of the drug. The development of numerous drugs has often halted at clinical testing stages, and several of them were due to the pharmacological properties of the agents, resulting in increased drug development cost. The current review provides an example of how improved clinical activity can be achieved by changing the formulations of a drug with poor bioavailability. Thus, it emphasizes the importance of understanding pharmacologic characteristics of the drug in drug development.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFenretinideHumansInfusions, IntravenousLymphoma, T-CellNeuroblastomaTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsFenretinidedrug formulation developmentFenretinidefenretinide/LYM-X-SORB®fenretinide–LYM-X-SORB®LYM-X-SORB®pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID28429653
PMCPMC5478002
OpenAlexW2605660450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.