Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429611›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2017

Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Amisha Wallia, Guillermo E Umpierrez, Robert J Rushakoff, David C Klonoff, Daniel J Rubin, Sherita Hill Golden, Curtiss B Cook, Bithika Thompson, DTS Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital Panel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06607224 (Effect of the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Standard Glycemic Control for Insulin Therapy Adjustment and Decision Making in Noncritical Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Hospitalized in Medical and Surgical Wards.), which is not on this map. Cited by 68 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06607224 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effect of the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Standard Glycemic Control for Insulin Therapy Adjustment and Decision Making in Noncritical Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Hospitalized in Medical and Surgical Wards.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonRan2022 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus Type 2, HospitalizationArmsExperimental (Decision making guided by CGM)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Survey of Diabetes Technology in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Amisha Wallia1 Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guillermo E Umpierrez2 Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Robert J Rushakoff3 University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
David C Klonoff4 Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Daniel J Rubin5 Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Sherita Hill Golden6 Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Curtiss B Cook7 Arizona State University, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Bithika Thompson8 Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
DTS Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital Panel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In June 2016, Diabetes Technology Society convened a panel of US experts in inpatient diabetes management to discuss the current and potential role of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in the hospital. This discussion combined with a literature review was a follow-up to a meeting, which took place in May 2015. The panel reviewed evidence on use of CGM in 3 potential inpatient scenarios: (1) the intensive care unit (ICU), (2) non-ICU, and (3) transitioning outpatient CGM use into the hospital setting. Panel members agreed that data from limited studies and theoretical considerations suggested that use of CGM in the hospital had the potential to improve patient clinical outcomes, and in particular reduction of hypoglycemia. Panel members discussed barriers to widespread adoption of CGM, which patients would benefit most from use of this technology, and what type of outcome studies are needed to guide use of CGM in the inpatient setting.

Indexed as

InpatientsBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansHypoglycemiaBlood Glucosecontinuous glucose monitordiabetesglucosehospitalhypoglycemiainpatient

Identifiers

PMID28429611
PMCPMC5950996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.