Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429195›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2017

Computer-Assisted Diagnosis System for Breast Cancer in Computed Tomography Laser Mammography (CTLM).

Afsaneh Jalalian, Syamsiah Mashohor, Rozi Mahmud, Babak Karasfi, M Iqbal Saripan, Abdul Rahman Ramli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Involvement of Machine Learning for Breast Cancer Image Classification: A Survey.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Afsaneh JalalianFaculty of Computer and Communication Systems, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia. jalalian.afsaneh@gmail.com.
Syamsiah MashohorFaculty of Computer and Communication Systems, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Rozi MahmudFaculty of Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Babak KarasfiFaculty of Computer and Information Technology Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
M Iqbal SaripanFaculty of Computer and Communication Systems, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Abdul Rahman RamliFaculty of Computer and Communication Systems, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Seri Kembangan, Malaysia.
Universiti Putra Malaysia · MYQazvin Islamic Azad University · IR

Funding

Ministry of Science, Technology & Innovation (MOSTI) Malaysia 5457080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography laser mammography (Eid et al. Egyp J Radiol Nucl Med, 37(1): p. 633-643, 1) is a non-invasive imaging modality for breast cancer diagnosis, which is time-consuming and challenging for the radiologist to interpret the images. Some issues have increased the missed diagnosis of radiologists in visual manner assessment in CTLM images, such as technical reasons which are related to imaging quality and human error due to the structural complexity in appearance. The purpose of this study is to develop a computer-aided diagnosis framework to enhance the performance of radiologist in the interpretation of CTLM images. The proposed CAD system contains three main stages including segmentation of volume of interest (VOI), feature extraction and classification. A 3D Fuzzy segmentation technique has been implemented to extract the VOI. The shape and texture of angiogenesis in CTLM images are significant characteristics to differentiate malignancy or benign lesions. The 3D compactness features and 3D Grey Level Co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) have been extracted from VOIs. Multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) pattern recognition has developed for classification of the normal and abnormal lesion in CTLM images. The performance of the proposed CAD system has been measured with different metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and area under receiver operative characteristics (AROC), which are 95.2, 92.4, 98.1, and 0.98%, respectively.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIndiaMammographyReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed3D GLCM features3D shape featuresBreast cancerComputed tomography laser mammography (CTLM)Computer-aided diagnosis systems (CADs)Multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN)

Identifiers

PMID28429195
PMCPMC5681463
OpenAlexW2605865949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.