Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429193›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2017

Effect of non-coherent infrared light (LED, λ945 ± 20 nm) on bone repair in diabetic rats-morphometric and spectral analyses.

Alexandre Greca Diamantino, Renata Amadei Nicolau, Davidson Ribeiro Costa, Alessandra Paes de Barros Almeida, Danila Xênia de Miranda Mato, Marco Antonio de Oliveira, Ana Maria do Espírito Santo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandre Greca DiamantinoInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Renata Amadei NicolauInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Davidson Ribeiro CostaInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil. rani@univap.br.
Alessandra Paes de Barros AlmeidaInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Danila Xênia de Miranda MatoInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Marco Antonio de OliveiraInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Ana Maria do Espírito SantoInstitute of Research and Development, Universidade do Vale do Paraíba (Univap), Av. Shishima Hifumi, 2911-Urbanova, São José dos Campos, SP, 12244-000, Brazil.
Universidade do Vale do Paraíba · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phototherapy using coherent light (lasers) and non-coherent light (light-emitting diodes (LEDs)) has been investigated for the purpose of biomodulation in biological tissues. Several effects can be expected, including pain moderation, biostimulation of cellular tropism, anti-inflammatory effects, regular circulatory stimulation, and tissue repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LED (λ945 ± 20 nm, 48 mW) therapy on the regeneration process in femoral lesions of rats (Wistar). Seven irradiation sessions were held, with a 48-h interval between sessions. The animals were euthanised 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery. Bone samples were analysed by histomorphometry, micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and optical densitometry. The results demonstrated the effective positive influence of low-intensity LED therapy using the near-infrared region on the tissue repair process in diabetic animals, especially in the early stages of repair (14 and 21 days after surgery). It can be concluded that LED therapy positively influences bone formation in the early stages of the bone repair process in non-diabetic and diabetic animals, without causing changes in the optical density and volume of tissue in the final stages. No influence of LED therapy was observed on the percentage of calcium, percentage of phosphorus, Ca/P ratio, or optical mineral density in non-diabetic animals. However, increased mineral concentration was evident in the diabetic animals treated with the LED during the repair process.

Indexed as

Infrared RaysPhototherapySpectrometry, X-Ray EmissionAnimalsDensitometryDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalFemurMaleRats, WistarWound HealingBone repairDiabetesLight-emitting diode (LED)Micro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (μ-EDX)Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

Identifiers

PMID28429193
OpenAlexW2607053114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.