Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429163›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial isolates from patients presenting with ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections in the German community healthcare setting.

B Olzowy, M Kresken, M Havel, D Hafner, B Körber-Irrgang, Working Party ‘Antimicrobial Resistance’ of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy: Nanoformulation Engineering and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

B OlzowyHNO-Zentrum Landsberg, Hubert-von-Herkomer-Straße 111, 86899, Landsberg, Germany.
M KreskenAntiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Campus of the University of Applied Sciences, Von-Liebig-Straße 20, 53359, Rheinbach, Germany. michael.kresken@antiinfectives-intelligence.de.
M HavelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
D HafnerInstitute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
B Körber-IrrgangAntiinfectives Intelligence GmbH, Campus of the University of Applied Sciences, Von-Liebig-Straße 20, 53359, Rheinbach, Germany.
Working Party ‘Antimicrobial Resistance’ of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy
Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DERational (Germany) · DETH Köln - University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empiric initial antibiotic therapy of bacterial infections is based primarily upon the susceptibility of the most common causative pathogens. The purpose of this study was to provide susceptibility data on six bacterial species known to cause ear, nose and throat (ENT) infections. A total of 1066 isolates collected during a nationwide laboratory-based surveillance study were analysed. All Streptococcus pyogenes isolates were penicillin (PEN)-susceptible, indicating that natural penicillins can still be recommended as the first-line treatment for group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Of the S. pneumoniae isolates, 92.9% were PEN-susceptible and of the Haemophilus influenzae isolates, 89.7% were amoxicillin-susceptible, retaining aminopenicillins as the first-line treatment for acute otitis media (AOM) and acute rhinosinusitis (ARS), in case antibiotic therapy is considered. In contrast, cefuroxime axetil seems less likely to be suitable for the treatment of AOM or ARS, as all Moraxella catarrhalis and >99% of the H. influenzae isolates were categorised as intermediate or resistant. The susceptibility rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 97-100% for the drugs tested, except for the fluoroquinolones (87.6%). Overall, bacterial isolates from outpatients presenting with ENT infections showed low frequencies of resistance in Germany. However, given the emergence of multidrug resistance to standard antibiotics in Escherichia coli and other pathogens, inappropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for the treatment of ENT infections has to be avoided.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsBacterial InfectionsCommunity Health ServicesGermanyHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsOtitisPharyngitisRhinitisAnti-Infective AgentsAcute Otitis MediumChronic Suppurative Otitis MediumClavulanic AcidEUCASTMacrolides

Identifiers

PMID28429163
OpenAlexW2606568991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.