Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429143›Full record

SynthesisEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2017

How to treat lumbar disc herniation in pregnancy? A systematic review on current standards.

Alberto Di Martino, Fabrizio Russo, Luca Denaro, Vincenzo Denaro

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto Di MartinoDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. dimartino.cbm@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-4951
Fabrizio RussoDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Luca DenaroCattedra di Neurochirurgia, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Padova, Padua, Italy.
Vincenzo DenaroDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this systematic review, we aim to illustrate the current and safe concepts in the assessment, diagnosis and management of herniated lumbar disc (HLD) during pregnancy.

methodsA systematic review and reporting on the diagnosis, treatment and clinical results of HLD during pregnancy is performed.

resultsThe MRI represents the first level and safest diagnostic tool for pregnant women affected by spinal problems allowing for a noninvasive and detailed radiological examination of the spine. The initial management of pregnant women affected by HLD is conservative, and primarily aimed to pain therapy. Whenever radicular pain and progressive neurological deficits unresponsive to medical management occur, surgery should be considered. Few case reports regarding the operative management of HLD in pregnant women have been published up to date. Laminectomy and/or microdiscectomy represent the classical and most commonly used techniques that can be safely performed without affecting pregnancy, delivery, or baby's health. Endoscopic discectomy may be an alternative. The most adequate timing and surgical position are chosen based on to the fetal gestational age and site of the pathology.

conclusionsSurgical treatments during pregnancy impose multiple medical and ethical problems. Timely diagnosis by MRI, careful clinical evaluation, and surgical treatment represent safe and effective procedures. Ongoing evolution of surgical, anesthesiological and obstetrical procedures results in favorable outcomes. However, interdisciplinary management and a wide knowledge of pregnancy-related pathologies are crucial for the best outcome for both mother and child.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraePregnancy ComplicationsEndoscopyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyConservative treatmentDiagnostic imagingLumbar disk herniationPregnancySurgery

Identifiers

PMID28429143
OpenAlexW2605845823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.