ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2017
Is there an alternative treatment for patients intolerant to antiplatelet therapy if percutaneous left atrial appendage closure is considered?
Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of concomitant exclusion of left atrial appendage during novel transapical off-pump beating heart mitral valve repair.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2024Article
- Robotics-assisted epicardial left atrial appendage clip exclusion.JTCVS techniques · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLeft atrial appendage (LAA) closure has become of major interest for patients with atrial fibrillation intolerant to oral anticoagulation therapy (OAC). Patients with a contraindication to both OAC and antiplatelet therapy are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure. We aimed to find an alternative treatment for these specific patients.
methodsFrom March 2014 until December 2015 five patients were referred for percutaneous LAA closure. Alternative treatment was necessary due to an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy (n = 4) or after previous failed percutaneous device implantation (n = 1). A stand-alone full thoracoscopic closure of the LAA using the Atriclip PRO device (AtriCure Inc., Dayton, OH, USA) was performed under guidance of transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). After three months all patients underwent a computed tomography scan. Mean follow-up was 7.2 months [range 4.5-9.8 months].
resultsAll procedures were achieved without the occurrence of complications. Complete LAA closure was obtained in all patients without any residual flow confirmed by TEE. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed persisting adequate clip positioning with complete LAA closure and absence of intracardial thrombi. During follow-up no thromboembolic events occurred.
conclusionFor atrial fibrillation patients with an absolute contraindication to OAC and antiplatelet therapy a stand-alone, minimally invasive thoracoscopic closure of the LAA is a safe and feasible alternative treatment. This might be a solution to avoid serious bleeding complications while eliminating the thromboembolic risk originating from the LAA in patients who are not eligible for percutaneous LAA closure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.