Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429117›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2017

A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.

Marcin Madziala, Jacek Smereka, Marek Dabrowski, Steve Leung, Kurt Ruetzler, Lukasz Szarpak

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03602183 (A Comparison of Direct vs. Video-laryngoscopes for Different Emergency Pediatric Airway Scenarios), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03602183 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison of Direct vs. Video-laryngoscopes for Different Emergency Pediatric Airway Scenarios

TypeinterventionalSponsorLazarski UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled83ConditionsEndotracheal Intubation, Pediatric, Cardiac Arrest, InjuriesArmsMacintosh laryngoscope, Miller laryngoscope, McGrath MAC EMS, GlideScope
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolution of videolaryngoscopy in pediatric population.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcin MadzialaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4 Street, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
Jacek SmerekaDepartment of Emergency Medical Service, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Marek DabrowskiDepartment of Rescue and Disaster Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Steve LeungDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kurt RuetzlerDepartment of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lukasz SzarpakDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4 Street, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland. Lukasz.szarpak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0973-5455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emergency airway management in children is generally considered to be challenging, and endotracheal intubation requires a high level of personal skills and experience. Immobilization of the cervical spine is indicated in all patients with the risk of any cervical spine injury but significantly aggravates endotracheal intubation. The best airway device in this setting has not been established yet, although the use of videolaryngoscopes is generally promising. Seventy-five moderately experienced paramedics of the Emergency Medical Service of Poland performed endotracheal intubations in a pediatric manikin in three airway scenarios: (A) normal airway, (B) manual in-line cervical immobilization, and (C) cervical immobilization using a Patriot cervical extrication collar and using two airway techniques: (1) McGrath videolaryngoscope and (2) Macintosh blade in a randomized sequence. First-attempt intubation success rate, time to intubation, glottis visualization, and subjective ease of intubation were investigated in this study. Intubation of difficult airways, including manual in-line and cervical collar immobilization, using the McGrath was significantly faster, with a higher first-attempt intubation success rate, better glottic visualization, and ease of intubation, compared to Macintosh-guided intubation. In the normal airway, both airway techniques performed equal.

conclusionOur manikin study indicates that the McGrath may be a reasonable first intubation technique option for endotracheal intubation in difficult pediatric emergencies. Further clinical studies are therefore indicated. What is known : • Airway management in pediatrics is challenging and requires a high level of skills and experience. Cervical immobilization is indicated in all patients with any risk of cervical spine injury, but it significantly aggravates endotracheal intubation in these patients. Videolaryngoscopes have been reported to ease intubation and provide better airway visualization in the regular clinical setting. What is new: • The McGrath is an easy-to-use and clinically often used videolaryngoscope, but it has never been investigated in pediatrics with an immobilized cervical spine. In the normal airway, the McGrath provided better airway visualization compared to Macintosh laryngoscopy. However, better visualization did not lead to decreased time to intubation and a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt. In difficult airways, the McGrath provided better airway visualization and this led to faster intubation, a higher first-attempt intubation success rate, and better ease of intubation compared to Macintosh-guided intubation.

Indexed as

LaryngoscopesRestraint, PhysicalCervical VertebraeChildClinical CompetenceCross-Over StudiesEmergency Medical TechniciansEmergency TreatmentHumansIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyManikinsTime FactorsVideo RecordingAirway managementCervical immobilizationManikin studyPediatric endotracheal intubationVideolaryngoscopy

Identifiers

PMID28429117
PMCPMC5432598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.