Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429102›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017

Improved systemic treatment for early breast cancer improves cure rates, modifies metastatic pattern and shortens post-metastatic survival: 35-year results from the Munich Cancer Registry.

Dieter Hölzel, Renate Eckel, Ingo Bauerfeind, Bernd Baier, Thomas Beck, Michael Braun, Johannes Ettl, Ulrich Hamann, Marion Kiechle, Sven Mahner and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. 4th ESO-ESMO International Consensus Guidelines for Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC 4)†.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2018
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. EClinicalMedicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Breast cancer: are long-term and intermittent endocrine therapies equally effective?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Does adjuvant therapy reduce postmetastatic survival?Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Dieter HölzelMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Tumorregister München, Klinikum Großhadern/IBE, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Renate EckelMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Tumorregister München, Klinikum Großhadern/IBE, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Ingo BauerfeindHead of the Breast Cancer Project Group of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM) and of Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Landshut, Landshut, Germany.
Bernd BaierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Dachau, Dachau, Germany.
Thomas BeckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany.
Michael BraunDepartment of Gynaecology, Rotkreuzklinikum, Munich, Germany.
Johannes EttlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Ulrich HamannDepartment of Gynaecology, Rotkreuzklinikum, Munich, Germany.
Marion KiechleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Christian SchindlbeckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Traunstein, Traunstein, Germany.
Johann de WaalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Klinikum Dachau, Dachau, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBreast Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Munich, Germany.
Jutta EngelMunich Cancer Registry (MCR) of the Munich Tumour Centre (TZM), Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology (IBE), University Hospital of Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU), Tumorregister München, Klinikum Großhadern/IBE, 81377, Munich, Germany. engel@ibe.med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEHelios Amper-Klinikum Dachau · DELMU Klinikum · DERotkreuzklinikum München · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DERosenheim Technical University of Applied Sciences · DETechnical University of Munich · DEUniversity of Applied Sciences Landshut · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSystemic therapies (ATHs) in early breast cancer have improved the survival of breast cancer (BC) patients in recent decades. The magnitude of the changes in overall, metastasis-free (MFS) and post-metastatic (PMS) survival and in the metastasis (MET) pattern will be described. PATIENT AND

methodsWe analysed 60,227 patients with a diagnosis of T-N-M0 BC between 1978 and 2013 and 11,983 patients with metastases (MET) in the Munich Cancer Registry. Patients will be divided into four time periods to identify relationships between BC and METs. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the impact of the BC subtype and MET status on survival with the time periods as surrogate markers for ATH evolution.

resultsDuring the observation period, 5-year relative survival has improved from 80.3 to 93.6% with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.54 (P < 0.0001). Successful implementation of ATH has changed the MET pattern. The percentage of liver and CNS METs has more than doubled, the rate of lung METs remains stable, and the rate of bone METs has been reduced by approximately 50%. MFS has been prolonged with a hazard ratio 0.75 (P < 0.0001), but PMS has declined (hazard ratio 1.36; P < 0.0001); however, effects of adjuvant and palliative treatments cannot be separated. These results do not contradict improvements in advanced BC and do not suggest alterations of MET tumour biology by ATH.

conclusionsOver the past three decades, ATHs have dramatically improved patient survival after BC diagnosis-most likely, by eradicating prevalent micro-METs; as a result, the MET pattern has changed. Eradicating only a portion of the first METs results in delaying the onset of subsequent MET, which leads to an apparently paradoxical effect: an extension of the MET-free interval and a reduction in PMS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGermanyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesBreast cancerMetastasisMetastasis organsSurvivalTime trend

Identifiers

PMID28429102
PMCPMC11819226
OpenAlexW2606386320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.