Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429092›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2017

Natural History of MEN1 GEP-NET: Single-Center Experience After a Long Follow-Up.

Francesco Giudici, Tiziana Cavalli, Francesca Giusti, Giorgio Gronchi, Giacomo Batignani, Francesco Tonelli, Maria Luisa Brandi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesco GiudiciDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy. francesco.giudici1@gmail.com.
Tiziana CavalliDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Francesca GiustiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Giorgio GronchiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Giacomo BatignaniDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Francesco TonelliDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
Maria Luisa BrandiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50139, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome (MEN1) natural history is poorly evaluated, and few single-institution experiences about hereditary gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are reported. Our purpose is to analyze the role of GEP-NET in MEN1-related death, as well as the behavior of these lesions during follow-up.

methodsThe study population consists of 77 patients diagnosed with MEN1 GEP-NET, regularly followed up since 1990. Extensive clinical data were prospectively recorded. Statistical analysis was performed both on the whole population of 77 patients and on two subgroups including patients who, during the long lasting study period, underwent GEP-NET surgery (50 pts) and who did not (27 pts), respectively.

resultsTwenty-five males (32.5%) and 52 females (67.5%) were enrolled. Sixty-four patients had MEN1 family history (83.1%), and genetic mutation was detected in 67 cases (87%). The mean age at GEP-NET diagnosis was 41.4 years (SD = 13.6); 16 patients (20.8%) had GEP-NET diagnosed before age 30 and 12 cases (15.6%) before 1996. The mean interval time between MEN1 diagnosis and GEP-NET detection was 5.7 years (range -11/37; SD = 8.1 years). Overall, the mean follow-up time from MEN1 diagnosis was 15.8 years (SD = 9.7 years) and from GEP-NET diagnosis was 9.6 years (SD = 6.9 years). Gastrinoma was the most frequent functioning GEP-NET and pancreatoduodenectomy the most adopted surgery. GEP-NET progression affected 12 patients within the non-surgical group, while 18 subjects developed progression after surgery.

conclusionsOur single-center data provide information on epidemiologic, clinical and pathological features of GEP-NET in MEN1 making possible to clarify their natural history.

Indexed as

Intestinal NeoplasmsMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAdultDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrinomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationPancreaticoduodenectomySurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID28429092
OpenAlexW2607469879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.