Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28429044›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Lilian Yuri Itaya Yamaga, Marcelo L Cunha, Guilherme C Campos Neto, Marcio R T Garcia, Ji H Yang, Cleber P Camacho, Jairo Wagner, Marcelo B G Funari

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. EANM practice guideline for PET/CT imaging in medullary thyroid carcinoma.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. The utility ofThyroid research · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Role of Peptides in Diagnostics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Clinical relevance ofRadiology and oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Endocrine · 2019
    Article
  14. Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma: An Update on Imaging.Journal of thyroid research · 2019
    Review
  15. Medical imaging modalities using nanoprobes for cancer diagnosis: A literature review on recent findings.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lilian Yuri Itaya YamagaImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil. itayay@hotmail.com.
Marcelo L CunhaImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Guilherme C Campos NetoImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Marcio R T GarciaImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Ji H YangMultiple Neoplasia Outpatiet Clinic, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cleber P CamachoMultiple Neoplasia Outpatiet Clinic, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jairo WagnerImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.
Marcelo B G FunariImaging Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Av. Albert Einstein, 627, São Paulo, 05651-901, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to prospectively compare the detection rate of

methodsFifteen patients with raised Ctn levels and/or CI evidence of recurrence underwent

resultsPET/CT evidenced recurrence in 14 of 15 patients. There were 13 true positive (TP), 1 true negative (TN), 1 false positive (FP) and no false negative (FN) cases, resulting in a sensitivity and accuracy of 100% and 93%. SPECT/CT was positive in 6 of 15 cases. There were 6 TP, 2 TN, 7 FN and no FP cases, resulting in a sensitivity of 46% and accuracy of 53%. CI procedures detected tumor lesions in 14 of 15 patients. There were 13 TP, 1TN, 1 FP and no FN cases with a sensitivity of 100% and accuracy of 93%. A significantly higher number of lesions was detected by PET/CT (112 lesions, p = 0.005) and CI (109 lesions, p = 0.005) in comparison to SPECT/CT (16 lesions). There was no significant difference between PET/CT and CI for the total number of detected lesions (p = 0.734). PET/CT detected more lesions than SPECT/CT regardless of the organ. PET/CT detected more bone lesions but missed some neck nodal metastases evidenced by CI. The number of lesions per region demonstrated by PET/CT and CI were similar in the other sites.

conclusion

Indexed as

Organometallic CompoundsAdultAgedCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOctreotideRecurrenceSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographyThyroid NeoplasmsYoung Adultgallium Ga 68 dotatateindium-111-octreotideOctreotideOrganometallic Compounds111In-octreotide68Ga-DOTATATEMedullary thyroid carcinomaPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.