Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28428975›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in psychology2017

Parenting in Animals.

Karen L Bales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in psychology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Face to face interactions in chimpanzee (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evolution of affiliation: patterns of convergence from genomes to behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Maternal behaviour in domestic dogs.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karen L BalesDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Davis.

Funding

National Institute on Aging (NIA) ColonyP51OD011107 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI Simon J. Atkinson · 2012 to 2026
$191.5M
Effects of Chronic Intranasal OxytocinR01HD071998 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BALES, KAREN L. · 2012 to 2016
$4.5M
Molecular and Neural Networks Underlying Social AttachmentR01MH108319 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BALES, KAREN L., SHAH, NIRAO MAHESH · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD071998NIH HHS P51 OD011107NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of parenting in animals has allowed us to come to a better understanding of the neural and physiological mechanisms that underlie mammalian parental behavior. The long-term effects of parenting (and parental abuse or neglect) on offspring, and the neurobiological changes that underlie those changes, have also been best studied in animal models. Our greater experimental control and ability to directly manipulate neural and hormonal systems, as well as the environment of the subjects, will ensure that animal models remain important in the study of parenting; while in the future, the great variety of parental caregiving systems displayed by animals should be more thoroughly explored. Most importantly, cross-talk between animal and human subjects research should be promoted.

Identifiers

PMID28428975
PMCPMC5393448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.