Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28428875›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2017

Genetic relationships among

Xianghui Yang, Samaneh Kazemiani Najafabadi, Muhammad Qasim Shahid, Zhike Zhang, Yi Jing, Weiling Wei, Jingcheng Wu, Yongshun Gao, Shunquan Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete plastome of a subtropical treeMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  8. Frontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic relationships amongEcology and evolution · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xianghui YangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-9288
Samaneh Kazemiani NajafabadiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Muhammad Qasim ShahidState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-4355
Zhike ZhangState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Yi JingBGI-Shenzhen Guangdong China.
Weiling WeiState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Jingcheng WuEnvironment and Life Science College of Putian University Fuzhou China.
Yongshun GaoState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
Shunquan LinState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources South China Agricultural University Guangzhou China.
South China Agricultural University · CNBGI Group (China) · CNPutian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) was used to illuminate the genetic relationships among

Indexed as

cluster analysisEriobotrya genusphylogenetic relationshipRAD‐seqSNP

Identifiers

PMID28428875
PMCPMC5395450
OpenAlexW2600326274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.