Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28428540›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Temporal dynamics of saccades explained by a self-paced process.

Roy Amit, Dekel Abeles, Izhar Bar-Gad, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. The role of attention in eye-movement awareness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roy AmitSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel. royamit@post.tau.ac.il.
Dekel AbelesSchool of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Izhar Bar-GadThe Leslie and Susan Goldschmidt (Gonda) Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 5290002, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-4083
Shlomit Yuval-GreenbergSagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory organs are thought to sample the environment rhythmically thereby providing periodic perceptual input. Whisking and sniffing are governed by oscillators which impose rhythms on the motor-control of sensory acquisition and consequently on sensory input. Saccadic eye movements are the main visual sampling mechanism in primates, and were suggested to constitute part of such a rhythmic exploration system. In this study we characterized saccadic rhythmicity, and examined whether it is consistent with autonomous oscillatory generator or with self-paced generation. Eye movements were tracked while observers were either free-viewing a movie or fixating a static stimulus. We inspected the temporal dynamics of exploratory and fixational saccades and quantified their first-order and high-order dependencies. Data were analyzed using methods derived from spike-train analysis, and tested against mathematical models and simulations. The findings show that saccade timings are explained by first-order dependencies, specifically by their refractory period. Saccade-timings are inconsistent with an autonomous pace-maker but are consistent with a "self-paced" generator, where each saccade is a link in a chain of neural processes that depend on the outcome of the saccade itself. We propose a mathematical model parsimoniously capturing various facets of saccade-timings, and suggest a possible neural mechanism producing the observed dynamics.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalSaccadesAdultCentral Pattern GeneratorsFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleRefractory Period, Electrophysiological

Identifiers

PMID28428540
PMCPMC5430543
OpenAlexW2605333426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.