Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28428255›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2017

Nucleosome-nucleosome interactions via histone tails and linker DNA regulate nuclear rigidity.

Yuta Shimamoto, Sachiko Tamura, Hiroshi Masumoto, Kazuhiro Maeshima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Nuclear destabilisation - a possible genesis of cancer?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The shifting paradigm of chromatin structure: from the 30-nm chromatin fiber to liquid-like organization.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Early dynamics of chromatin decompaction drive nuclear stiffening.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuta ShimamotoQuantitative Mechanobiology Laboratory, Center for Frontier Research, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan yuta.shimamoto@nig.ac.jp kmaeshim@nig.ac.jp.
Sachiko TamuraBiological Macromolecules Laboratory, Structural Biology Center, National Institute of Genetics, Mishima 411-8540, Japan.
Hiroshi MasumotoBiomedical Research Support Center, Nagasaki University School of Medicine; Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan.
Kazuhiro MaeshimaDepartment of Genetics, School of Life Science, Sokendai (Graduate University for Advanced Studies), Mishima 411-8540, Japan yuta.shimamoto@nig.ac.jp kmaeshim@nig.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells, as well as the nuclei inside them, experience significant mechanical stress in diverse biological processes, including contraction, migration, and adhesion. The structural stability of nuclei must therefore be maintained in order to protect genome integrity. Despite extensive knowledge on nuclear architecture and components, however, the underlying physical and molecular mechanisms remain largely unknown. We address this by subjecting isolated human cell nuclei to microneedle-based quantitative micromanipulation with a series of biochemical perturbations of the chromatin. We find that the mechanical rigidity of nuclei depends on the continuity of the nucleosomal fiber and interactions between nucleosomes. Disrupting these chromatin features by varying cation concentration, acetylating histone tails, or digesting linker DNA results in loss of nuclear rigidity. In contrast, the levels of key chromatin assembly factors, including cohesin, condensin II, and CTCF, and a major nuclear envelope protein, lamin, are unaffected. Together with in situ evidence using living cells and a simple mechanical model, our findings reveal a chromatin-based regulation of the nuclear mechanical response and provide insight into the significance of local and global chromatin structures, such as those associated with interdigitated or melted nucleosomal fibers.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDNAElasticityHistonesHumansModels, MolecularNucleosomesChromatinDNAHistonesNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID28428255
PMCPMC5449155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.