Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28428202›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of general physiology2017

Precision physiology and rescue of brain ion channel disorders.

Jeffrey Noebels

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of general physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Distinct Features of Interictal Activity Predict Seizure Localization and Burden in a Mouse Model of Childhood Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jeffrey NoebelsDepartment of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 jnoebels@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2887-0839
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

PLASTICITY IN DEVELOPING EPILEPTIC BRAINR01NS029709 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NOEBELS, JEFFREY · 1991 to 2025
$9.1M
SUDEP Research Alliance: Cardiac Gene and Circuit Mechanisms; Application 7 of 7U01NS090340 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI NOEBELS, JEFFREY · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029709NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS090340
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ion channel genes, originally implicated in inherited excitability disorders of muscle and heart, have captured a major role in the molecular diagnosis of central nervous system disease. Their arrival is heralded by neurologists confounded by a broad phenotypic spectrum of early-onset epilepsy, autism, and cognitive impairment with few effective treatments. As detection of rare structural variants in channel subunit proteins becomes routine, it is apparent that primary sequence alone cannot reliably predict clinical severity or pinpoint a therapeutic solution. Future gains in the clinical utility of variants as biomarkers integral to clinical decision making and drug discovery depend on our ability to unravel complex developmental relationships bridging single ion channel structure and human physiology.

Indexed as

AnimalsChannelopathiesEpilepsyHumansIon ChannelsPhenotypePrecision MedicineIon Channels

Identifiers

PMID28428202
PMCPMC5412535
OpenAlexW2605833610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.