Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427955›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of preventive medicine2017

Preventing Alcohol and Tobacco Exposed Pregnancies: CHOICES Plus in Primary Care.

Mary M Velasquez, Kirk L von Sternberg, R Louise Floyd, Danielle Parrish, Alicia Kowalchuk, Nanette S Stephens, Britta Ostermeyer, Charles Green, J Paul Seale, Patricia Dolan Mullen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of preventive medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01032772 (ChoicesPlus), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01032772 nacompletednot on this map

ChoicesPlus: Preconception Approach to Reducing Alcohol- and Tobacco-Exposed Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas at AustinRan2010 to 2013Enrolled261ConditionsAlcohol Use, Smoking, ContraceptionArmsChoices Plus, Information
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of preconception interventions in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Is Periconceptional Substance Use Associated with Unintended Pregnancy?Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Changing multiple health risk behaviors in CHOICES.Preventive medicine reports · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Mary M VelasquezHealth Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. Electronic address: velasquez@mail.utexas.edu.
Kirk L von SternbergHealth Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
R Louise FloydNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Danielle ParrishGraduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.
Alicia KowalchukDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Nanette S StephensHealth Behavior Research and Training Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Britta OstermeyerCollege of Medicine, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Charles GreenCenter for Clinical Research and Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas.
J Paul SealeDepartment of Family Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia.
Patricia Dolan MullenUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, Houston, Texas.
Baylor College of Medicine · USCenter for Clinical Research (United States) · USMercer University · USNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Houston · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

CHOICES+: Preconception approach to reducing alcohol & tobacco-exposed pregnancyU84DD000438 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI VELASQUEZ, MARY MARDEN · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U84 DD000438
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlcohol and tobacco use are common among U.S. women, yet if used during pregnancy these substances present significant preventable risks to prenatal and perinatal health. Because use of alcohol and tobacco often continue into the first trimester and beyond, especially among women with unintended pregnancies, effective evidence-based approaches are needed to decrease these risk behaviors. This study was designed to test the efficacy of CHOICES Plus, a preconception intervention for reducing the risk of alcohol- and tobacco-exposed pregnancies (AEPs and TEPs). STUDY

designRCT with two intervention groups: CHOICES Plus (n=131) versus Brief Advice (n=130). Data collected April 2011 to October 2013. Data analysis finalized February 2016. SETTING/

participantsSettings were 12 primary care clinics in a large Texas public healthcare system. Participants were women who were non-sterile, non-pregnant, aged 18-44 years, drinking more than three drinks per day or more than seven drinks per week, sexually active, and not using effective contraception (N=261). Forty-five percent were smokers.

interventionInterventions were two CHOICES Plus sessions and a contraceptive visit or Brief Advice and referral to community resources.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were reduced risk of AEP and TEP through 9-month follow-up.

resultsIn intention-to-treat analyses across 9 months, the CHOICES Plus group was more likely than the Brief Advice group to reduce risk of AEP with an incidence rate ratio of 0.620 (95% CI=0.511, 0.757) and absolute risk reduction of -0.233 (95% CI=-0.239, -0.226). CHOICES Plus group members at risk for both exposures were more likely to reduce TEP risk (incidence rate ratio, 0.597; 95% CI=0.424, 0.840 and absolute risk reduction, -0.233; 95% CI=-0.019, -0.521).

conclusionsCHOICES Plus significantly reduced AEP and TEP risk. Addressing these commonly co-occurring risk factors in a single preconception program proved both feasible and efficacious in a low-income primary care population. Intervening with women before they become pregnant could shift the focus in clinical practice from treatment of substance-exposed pregnancies to prevention of a costly public health concern.

trial registrationThis study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov NCT01032772.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorAdultAlcohol DrinkingEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIntention to Treat AnalysisPregnancyPrimary Health CareRisk Reduction BehaviorTexasTobacco SmokingTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28427955
PMCPMC6590512
OpenAlexW2606857055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.