Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427911›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, and immunity2017

Safety parameter considerations of anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in rats.

Mark P Jackson, Dennis Truong, Milene L Brownlow, Jessica A Wagner, R Andy McKinley, Marom Bikson, Ryan Jankord

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, and immunity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Allele-Specific PCR forDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mark P Jackson711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, CDI Building, 85 St. Nicholas Terrace, New York, NY 10031, United States.
Dennis TruongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, CDI Building, 85 St. Nicholas Terrace, New York, NY 10031, United States.
Milene L Brownlow711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States; Research Associateship Program, National Research Council, National Academies of Science, Washington DC 20001, United States.
Jessica A Wagner711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States.
R Andy McKinley711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States.
Marom BiksonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, CDI Building, 85 St. Nicholas Terrace, New York, NY 10031, United States.
Ryan Jankord711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright Patterson AFB, OH 45433, United States. Electronic address: Ryan.Jankord@us.af.mil.

Funding

A tool-box to control and enhance tDCS spatial precisionR01MH111896 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
CRCNS: Effects of Weak Applied Currents on Memory Consolidation During SleepR01MH092926 · NIMH · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI PARRA, LUCAS C · 2010 to 2014
$618k
Modulation of blood-brain-barrier (BBB) permeability by tDCS relevant electric fiR21EB017510 · NIBIB · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2014 to 2015
$421k
Wireless Pulse Oximetry (WiPOX) for Diagnosing Intra-Operative IschemiaR03EB017410 · NIBIB · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI BIKSON, MAROM · 2014 to 2015
$153k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB017410NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB017510NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH092926NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A commonly referenced transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) safety threshold derives from tDCS lesion studies in the rat and relies on electrode current density (and related electrode charge density) to support clinical guidelines. Concerns about the role of polarity (e.g. anodal tDCS), sub-lesion threshold injury (e.g. neuroinflammatory processes), and role of electrode montage across rodent and human studies support further investigation into animal models of tDCS safety. Thirty-two anesthetized rats received anodal tDCS between 0 and 5mA for 60min through one of three epicranial electrode montages. Tissue damage was evaluated using hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, Iba-1 immunohistochemistry, and computational brain current density modeling. Brain lesion occurred after anodal tDCS at and above 0.5mA using a 25.0mm

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainElectrodesEncephalitisFemaleMicrogliaModels, NeurologicalRatsSafetyTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCurrent densityDirect Current StimulationMicrogliaRat cortextDCStDCS modeling

Identifiers

PMID28427911
PMCPMC5969807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.