Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427468›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2017

Learning from biomedical linked data to suggest valid pharmacogenes.

Kevin Dalleau, Yassine Marzougui, Sébastien Da Silva, Patrice Ringot, Ndeye Coumba Ndiaye, Adrien Coulet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin DalleauLORIA (CNRS, Inria Nancy-Grand Est, University of Lorraine), Campus Scientifique, Nancy, France.
Yassine MarzouguiLORIA (CNRS, Inria Nancy-Grand Est, University of Lorraine), Campus Scientifique, Nancy, France.
Sébastien Da SilvaLORIA (CNRS, Inria Nancy-Grand Est, University of Lorraine), Campus Scientifique, Nancy, France.
Patrice RingotLORIA (CNRS, Inria Nancy-Grand Est, University of Lorraine), Campus Scientifique, Nancy, France.
Ndeye Coumba NdiayeUMR U1122 IGE-PCV (INSERM, University of Lorraine), 30 Rue Lionnois, Nancy, France.
Adrien CouletLORIA (CNRS, Inria Nancy-Grand Est, University of Lorraine), Campus Scientifique, Nancy, France. adrien.coulet@loria.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1466-062X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA standard task in pharmacogenomics research is identifying genes that may be involved in drug response variability, i.e., pharmacogenes. Because genomic experiments tended to generate many false positives, computational approaches based on the use of background knowledge have been proposed. Until now, only molecular networks or the biomedical literature were used, whereas many other resources are available.

methodWe propose here to consume a diverse and larger set of resources using linked data related either to genes, drugs or diseases. One of the advantages of linked data is that they are built on a standard framework that facilitates the joint use of various sources, and thus facilitates considering features of various origins. We propose a selection and linkage of data sources relevant to pharmacogenomics, including for example DisGeNET and Clinvar. We use machine learning to identify and prioritize pharmacogenes that are the most probably valid, considering the selected linked data. This identification relies on the classification of gene-drug pairs as either pharmacogenomically associated or not and was experimented with two machine learning methods -random forest and graph kernel-, which results are compared in this article.

resultsWe assembled a set of linked data relative to pharmacogenomics, of 2,610,793 triples, coming from six distinct resources. Learning from these data, random forest enables identifying valid pharmacogenes with a F-measure of 0.73, on a 10 folds cross-validation, whereas graph kernel achieves a F-measure of 0.81. A list of top candidates proposed by both approaches is provided and their obtention is discussed.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPharmacogeneticsSemantic WebComputational BiologyComputer GraphicsData MiningPhenotypeData miningKnowledge discovery from databasesLinked dataMachine learningPharmacogenomicsValid pharmacogenes

Identifiers

PMID28427468
PMCPMC5399403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.