Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427409›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2017

Efficacies of DHA-PPQ and AS/SP in patients with uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in an area of an unstable seasonal transmission in Sudan.

Abdelrahim O Mohamed, Muzamil M Abdel Hamid, Omer S Mohamed, Nuha S Elkando, Abdelmaroof Suliman, Mariam A Adam, Fahad Awad Ali Elnour, Elfatih M Malik

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. BMJ global health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Abdelrahim O MohamedDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan. abdelrahim_osman@yahoo.com.
Muzamil M Abdel HamidInstitute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
Omer S MohamedNeelain Institute for Medical Research, Alneelain University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Nuha S ElkandoAlzohor Health Centre, Damazin, Sudan.
Abdelmaroof SulimanAlsalam Health Centre, Damazin, Sudan.
Mariam A AdamCommunicable & Non Communicable Diseases Control Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Fahad Awad Ali ElnourCommunicable & Non Communicable Diseases Control Directorate, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan.
Elfatih M MalikDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
University of Khartoum · SDFederal Ministry of Health · SDAl-Neelain University · SD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT), together with other control measures, have reduced the burden of falciparum malaria in sub-Saharan countries, including Sudan. Sudan adopted ACT in 2004 with a remarkable reduction in mortality due to falciparum malaria. However, emergence of resistance to the first-line treatment artesunate and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (AS/SP) has created new challenges to the control of malaria in Sudan. A search for an alternative drug of choice for treating uncomplicated malaria has become inevitable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacies of dihydroartemisinin/piperaquine (DHA-PPQ) and AS/SP in an area of unstable transmission in Blue Nile State, Sudan in 2015-16.

methodsA total of 148 patients with uncomplicated malaria were recruited in the study from November 2015 to end of January 2016. Seventy-five patients received DHA-PPQ while 73 received AS/SP. Patients were monitored for clinical and parasitological outcomes following the standard WHO protocol for a period of 42 days for DHA-PPQ and 28 days for AS/SP; nested PCR (nPCR) was performed to confirm parasite re-appearance from day 7 onwards.

resultsFifty-five patients completed the DHA-PPQ arm protocol with success cure rate of 98.2% (95% CI 90.3-100%) and one late clinical failure 1.8% (95% CI 0.0-9.7%). The AS/SP showed adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) of 83.6% (95% CI 71.9-91.8%), early treatment failure was 1.6% (95% CI 0.0-8.8%) and late parasitological failure (LPF) was 14.8% (95% CI 7-26.2%). The respective PCR uncorrected LPF was 20%.

conclusionDHA-PPQ is an efficacious ACT and candidate for replacement of first-line treatment in Sudan while AS/SP showed high treatment failure rate and must be replaced.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntimalarialsArtemisininsChildChild, PreschoolDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansInfantMalaria, FalciparumMaleParasitemiaPiperazinesPlasmodium falciparumPyrimethamineQuinolinesAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolpiperaquinePiperazinesPyrimethamineQuinolinesSulfadoxinesulfadoxine-pyrimethamine-artesunateArtesunateDihydroartemisinin–piperaquineGenotypingMalariaSudanSulfadoxine–pyrimethamine

Identifiers

PMID28427409
PMCPMC5399425
OpenAlexW2607254151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.