Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427345›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2017

Variation in GP decisions on antihypertensive treatment in oldest-old and frail individuals across 29 countries.

Sven Streit, Marjolein Verschoor, Nicolas Rodondi, Daiana Bonfim, Robert A Burman, Claire Collins, Gerasimovska Kitanovska Biljana, Sandra Gintere, Raquel Gómez Bravo, Kathryn Hoffmann and 28 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Therapeutic inertia.Australian prescriber · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

38 authors at 20 institutions in 24 countries.

Sven StreitInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3813-4616
Marjolein VerschoorInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Nicolas RodondiInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Daiana BonfimHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Robert A BurmanVennesla Primary Health Care Centre, Bergen, Norway.
Claire CollinsIrish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland.
Gerasimovska Kitanovska BiljanaDepartment of Nephrology and Department of Family Medicine, University Clinical Centre, University St. Cyril and Metodius, Skopje, Macedonia.
Sandra GintereFaculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Riga Stradiņs University, Riga, Latvia.
Raquel Gómez BravoInstitute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Kathryn HoffmannDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Claudia IftodeTimis Society of Family Medicine, Sano Med West Private Clinic, Timisoara, Romania.
Kasper L JohansenDanish College of General Practitioners, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ngaire KerseSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tuomas H KoskelaDepartment of General Practice, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Sanda Kreitmayer PeštićFamily Medicine Department, Health Center Tuzla, Medical School, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Donata KurpasFamily Medicine Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Christian D MallenPrimary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.
Hubert MaisoneuvePrimary Care Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christoph MerloInstitute of Primary and Community Care Lucerne (IHAM), Lucerne, Switzerland.
Yolanda MuellerInstitute of Family Medicine Lausanne (IUMF), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christiane MuthInstitute of General Practice, Goethe-University, Frankfurt / Main, Germany.
Marija Petek ŠterDepartment for Family Medicine, Medical faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ferdinando PetrazzuoliSNAMID (National Society of Medical Education in General Practice), Prata Sannita, Italy.
Thomas RosemannInstitute of Primary Care, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin SattlerSSLMG, Societé Scientifique Luxembourgois en Medicine generale, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Zuzana ŠvadlenkováOrdinace Řepy, s.r.o., Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Athina TatsioniResearch Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
Hans ThulesiusFamily Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö and senior researcher Region Kronoberg, Växjö, Sweden.
Victoria TkachenkoDepartment of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine at Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine.
Peter TorzsaDepartment of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Rosy TsopraLIMICS, INSERM, U1142, F-75006 Paris, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, UMR_S 1142, F93000 Bobigny, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR_S 1142, F75006 Paris, Paris, France.
Tuz CananFamily Medicine Specialist, Kemaliye Town Hospital, Erzincan University, Erzincan, Turkey.
Rita P A ViegasFamily Doctor, Invited Assistant of the Department of Family Medicine, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Shlomo VinkerSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Margot W M de WaalDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Andreas ZellerCentre for Primary Health Care (uniham-bb), Basel, Switzerland.
Jacobijn GusseklooDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rosalinde K E PoortvlietDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Hippocratespad 21, 2333 ZD, Leiden, The Netherlands. R.K.E.Poortvliet@lumc.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Bern · CHLund University · SEDanish College of General Practitioners · DKErzincan Binali Yıldırım University · TRGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRInserm · FRKeele University · GBMedical University of Vienna · ATRiga Stradiņš University · LVSemmelweis University · HUShupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine · UATampere University · FITel Aviv University · ILUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity Clinical Centre · PLUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Geneva · CHUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn oldest-old patients (>80), few trials showed efficacy of treating hypertension and they included mostly the healthiest elderly. The resulting lack of knowledge has led to inconsistent guidelines, mainly based on systolic blood pressure (SBP), cardiovascular disease (CVD) but not on frailty despite the high prevalence in oldest-old. This may lead to variation how General Practitioners (GPs) treat hypertension. Our aim was to investigate treatment variation of GPs in oldest-olds across countries and to identify the role of frailty in that decision.

methodsUsing a survey, we compared treatment decisions in cases of oldest-old varying in SBP, CVD, and frailty. GPs were asked if they would start antihypertensive treatment in each case. In 2016, we invited GPs in Europe, Brazil, Israel, and New Zealand. We compared the percentage of cases that would be treated per countries. A logistic mixed-effects model was used to derive odds ratio (OR) for frailty with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for SBP, CVD, and GP characteristics (sex, location and prevalence of oldest-old per GP office, and years of experience). The mixed-effects model was used to account for the multiple assessments per GP.

resultsThe 29 countries yielded 2543 participating GPs: 52% were female, 51% located in a city, 71% reported a high prevalence of oldest-old in their offices, 38% and had >20 years of experience. Across countries, considerable variation was found in the decision to start antihypertensive treatment in the oldest-old ranging from 34 to 88%. In 24/29 (83%) countries, frailty was associated with GPs' decision not to start treatment even after adjustment for SBP, CVD, and GP characteristics (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.48-0.59; ORs per country 0.11-1.78).

conclusionsAcross countries, we found considerable variation in starting antihypertensive medication in oldest-old. The frail oldest-old had an odds ratio of 0.53 of receiving antihypertensive treatment. Future hypertension trials should also include frail patients to acquire evidence on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in oldest-old patients with frailty, with the aim to get evidence-based data for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceClinical Decision-MakingGeneral PractitionersAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleGlobal HealthHumansHypertensionMaleOdds RatioPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesAntihypertensive AgentsClinical variationElderlyFrailtyGeneral practitionersHypertensionOldest-old

Identifiers

PMID28427345
PMCPMC5399328
OpenAlexW2606455055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.