Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28427242›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Epidermal growth factor receptor variant III in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is not relevant for targeted therapy and irradiation.

Dominik Thomas Koch, Anja Pickhard, Lena Gebel, Anna Maria S Buchberger, Murat Bas, Carolin Mogler, Rudolf Reiter, Guido Piontek, Markus Wirth

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Significance of EGFRvIII Presence in Gastric Adenocarcinoma.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. [Research progress on the mechanisms of resistance to cetuximab targeted therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dominik Thomas KochDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Anja PickhardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Lena GebelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Anna Maria S BuchbergerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Murat BasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Carolin MoglerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Rudolf ReiterDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology, University of Ulm, 89070 Ulm, Germany.
Guido PiontekDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Markus WirthDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an important regulator of cell growth and survival, and is highly variable in tumor cells. The most prevalent variation of the EGFR extracellular domain is the EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII). Some studies imply that EGFRvIII may be responsible for the poor response to the monoclonal EGFR-antibody Cetuximab, used therapeutically in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Due to inconsistent data in the literature regarding EGFRvIII prevalence and clinical relevance in HNSCC, especially its predictive value, we examined EGFRvIII-transfected cell lines and patient tissue samples.

resultsIn contrast to other recent publications, we were able to demonstrate EGFRvIII expression in HNSCC. However, we noted that the different detection methods yielded inconsistent results. Furthermore, our EGFRvIII transfected and EGFR wild type cell lines exhibited similar characteristics and response rates in the performed in vitro experiments. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted various inhibition and combined irradiation experiments using three EGFRvIII-transfected cell lines. Moreover, a patient cohort of 149 cases consisting of formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) and fresh-frozen specimens was assayed via reverse transcriptase PCR (rtPCR) with gel electrophoresis and sequencing for EGFRvIII prevalence. In the rtPCR assays, we used five previously published EGFRvIII primers and EGFRvIII-positive glioblastoma tissue as a positive control. In addition, immunohistochemical staining was conducted.

conclusionsEGFRvIII can be detected in HNSCC patient samples. Nevertheless, the low prevalence and similar response rates to targeted drugs and irradiation in vitro cast doubt regarding the clinical relevance of EGFRvIII in HNSCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCetuximabCohort StudiesErbB ReceptorsFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyParaffin EmbeddingRadiotherapySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCetuximabepidermal growth factor receptor VIIIErbB ReceptorscetuximabEGFR variant IIIhead and neck squamous cell cancerradiationTKI

Identifiers

PMID28427242
PMCPMC5464818
OpenAlexW2591866999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.