Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28426817›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation of machine learning algorithms and structural features for optimal MRI-based diagnostic prediction in psychosis.

Raymond Salvador, Joaquim Radua, Erick J Canales-Rodríguez, Aleix Solanes, Salvador Sarró, José M Goikolea, Alicia Valiente, Gemma C Monté, María Del Carmen Natividad, Amalia Guerrero-Pedraza and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Raymond SalvadorFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquim RaduaFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Erick J Canales-RodríguezFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Aleix SolanesFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvador SarróFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
José M GoikoleaCentro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.
Alicia ValienteHospital Benito Menni - CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Gemma C MontéFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
María Del Carmen NatividadHospital Mare de Déu de la Mercè, Barcelona, Spain.
Amalia Guerrero-PedrazaHospital Benito Menni - CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Noemí MoroHospital Benito Menni - CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Paloma Fernández-CorcueraHospital Benito Menni - CASM, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.
Benedikt L AmannCentro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.
Teresa MaristanyHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain.
Eduard VietaCentro de Investigación Biomedica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Barcelona, Spain.
Peter J McKennaFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Edith Pomarol-ClotetFIDMAG - Germanes Hospitalaries, Barcelona, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESHospital Mare de Déu de la Mercè · ESFidmag Sisters Hospitallers · ESConsorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital del Mar Research Institute · ESHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A relatively large number of studies have investigated the power of structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) data to discriminate patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls. However, very few of them have also included patients with bipolar disorder, allowing the clinically relevant discrimination between both psychotic diagnostics. To assess the efficacy of sMRI data for diagnostic prediction in psychosis we objectively evaluated the discriminative power of a wide range of commonly used machine learning algorithms (ridge, lasso, elastic net and L0 norm regularized logistic regressions, a support vector classifier, regularized discriminant analysis, random forests and a Gaussian process classifier) on main sMRI features including grey and white matter voxel-based morphometry (VBM), vertex-based cortical thickness and volume, region of interest volumetric measures and wavelet-based morphometry (WBM) maps. All possible combinations of algorithms and data features were considered in pairwise classifications of matched samples of healthy controls (N = 127), patients with schizophrenia (N = 128) and patients with bipolar disorder (N = 128). Results show that the selection of feature type is important, with grey matter VBM (without data reduction) delivering the best diagnostic prediction rates (averaging over classifiers: schizophrenia vs. healthy 75%, bipolar disorder vs. healthy 63% and schizophrenia vs. bipolar disorder 62%) whereas algorithms usually yielded very similar results. Indeed, those grey matter VBM accuracy rates were not even improved by combining all feature types in a single prediction model. Further multi-class classifications considering the three groups simultaneously made evident a lack of predictive power for the bipolar group, probably due to its intermediate anatomical features, located between those observed in healthy controls and those found in patients with schizophrenia. Finally, we provide MRIPredict (https://www.nitrc.org/projects/mripredict/), a free tool for SPM, FSL and R, to easily carry out voxelwise predictions based on VBM images.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPsychotic DisordersYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28426817
PMCPMC5398548
OpenAlexW2606521544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.